My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/13/1994
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1994
>
12/13/1994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:04:27 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 2:52:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/13/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� s � <br />necessary to correct the problems they were experiencing due to <br />water seeping through the mortar between the bricks in the walls. <br />In addition, the windows were leaking and needed replacing. Funds <br />were not requested, nor made available, for either of these <br />problems since the future of the building was unknown. The roof <br />had been replaced not too long ago and had nothing to do with the <br />leaks from the walls or windows. <br />Commissioner Bird explained that he felt the diminution in the <br />appraised value was not necessarily due to the condition of the <br />building, but, in fact, was due to a depressed real estate market. <br />He felt that the condition of the building was just normal wear and <br />tear. <br />Peter Armfield, local appraiser, agreed with Commissioner <br />Bird's assessment that the deterioration of the building was <br />probably only a minor factor in the lowered value. He felt the <br />major factor was that there had been a real estate recession for <br />the last three years which had affected values of buildings like <br />the courthouse. <br />Commissioner Macht believed there was a very limited range of <br />users for that type of building, and Mr. Armfield agreed with <br />Commissioner Macht especially because of its size, design and <br />condition. <br />Commissioner Adams felt the old courthouse was never designed <br />to be put on the market and sold. <br />Chairman Tippin commented that the building contained the <br />first and last basement in Indian River County. As a child he had <br />heard jokes about the "downtown swimming pool," and records being <br />ruined during the rainy season. In defense of staff, he believed <br />that water had been leaking into that building since it was built. <br />Commissioner Bird understood that removing the wings was not <br />an option. He believed it would be too expensive and didn't see <br />what would be gained by retaining only the central core of the <br />building. He thought that the building could be advertised for <br />sale, but if the intent is to preserve the building for historical <br />purposes, there was no assurance of that without a caveat. <br />Commissioner Macht said he had furnished everyone with a copy <br />of his letter which contained information based on a series of <br />meetings he had had with people who were interested in a community <br />use for the building. He believed that a youth center, "mall" for <br />care -givers, citrus, historical, or discovery museum were possible <br />uses. He expected that a lot of organizations would be capable of <br />maintaining the building and it seemed to him to be the most <br />41 <br />December 13, 1994 <br />600( EA.f.E 0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.