My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03/12/2019 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2019
>
03/12/2019 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/31/2019 12:03:42 PM
Creation date
4/17/2019 2:30:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
03/12/2019
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
157
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
summarized TCHSC's efforts in assisting homeless veterans and unaccompanied <br />females. <br />(2:45 PM) Ms. Miller of IRC Rental Assistance described the County's efforts with <br />"Section 8" and Veterans Affairs Supportive Housing (VASH) funds from HUD, <br />specifically how those resources had been used to house 362 persons, including <br />veterans. Most recently, she stated that HUD provided 46 leasing vouchers for <br />veterans, and 41 of those had been used. <br />Discussion of Obstacles to Affordable Housing <br />(2:46 PM) Ms. Lafferty and Ms. Penaloza stated that residents of affordable housing <br />sometime need budget training to make better choices, especially when SHIP <br />requirements are so stringent and housing prices are on the rise. Mr. Saxton <br />commented that affordable housing units must be located near grocery stores, existing <br />utilities, and other services, and that the number of suitable properties was small and <br />the number of those for sale even smaller. He emphasized that streamlining and <br />expediting the rezoning process would be helpful, as would allowing more density in <br />multifamily zoning districts. Mr. Lipoff concurred that low housing density demotivates <br />the construction of affordable housing in IRC. <br />(3:00 PM) Mr. Seeburg left the meeting. <br />(3:03 PM) Mr. Flick specified that a key problem in IRC is that the average sale price <br />for affordable housing should be around $150,000, but that this is not a profitable <br />number for local developers. Mr. Flick added that he estimated IRC's need as 8,500 <br />rental units and an equal number of free-standing homes. Mr. Slater again mentioned <br />the need for a goal, right or wrong, at which point he believed the conversation could <br />progress to what's needed to hit the target. Ms. Dixon added that population and <br />employment growth is relevant to the discussion, and that signs of another housing <br />"bubble" (like 2008) were present. Mr. Powers reemphasized the importance of <br />beginning with a goal in mind and then gauging success against the goal a year from <br />now. <br />Discussion on Scope of Mission and Other Items for Further Consideration <br />(3:14 PM) Commissioner Solari recommended the AHAC achieve better understanding <br />of affordable housing success stories in other Florida counties. He warned that the size <br />of homes was a big factor in finding an acceptable way forward, and that asking for <br />increased density in affordable housing developments would result in a local political <br />fight. Finally, Commissioner Solari stressed the importance of the AHAC taking the time <br />to learn the issues first before setting any concrete goals. Councilwoman Moss <br />summarized that the main elements the AHAC should be studying presently include <br />funding, available land and zoning, population, employment growth, and nearby case <br />studies. Mr. Harper then contributed details regarding the "Vancouver model" of <br />community development -- although noting this model may not be applicable to IRC -- <br />and mentioned the importance of reducing impact fees. <br />5 <br />AHAC Unapproved Feb 14, 2019 <br />52 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.