My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2019-081
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2010's
>
2019
>
2019-081
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/11/2020 2:38:23 PM
Creation date
6/3/2019 1:48:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Agreement
Approved Date
05/21/2019
Control Number
2019-081
Agenda Item Number
8.H.
Entity Name
Crouch, Thomas G.
Crouch, Therese B.
Subject
Purchase and Sell Real Estate Agreement
26th Street Right-of-Way Acquisition
Warranty Agreement
Quit-ClaimDeed
Area
2625 58th Court
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
AFFORDABLE HOUSINCj ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS <br />DETAILED DISCUSSION <br />1. Establish an objective for 1,500 new affordable housing units in the County by 2025 and a total of 4,000 <br />new affordable housing units in the County by 2030. Per the AHAC, the County and its municipal <br />representatives determined that they could work together on that objective through advocating for full <br />funding of the State's Affordable Housing Trust Fund, including the State Apartment Incentive Loan (SAIL) <br />Program and the County's State Housing Initiative Partnership (SHIP) Program, advocating for allocation of <br />other state and federal affordable housing incentives to projects in the County (such as Low Income Housing <br />Tax Credits (LIHTC)), and from implementation of various AHAC recommendations that include ordinance <br />revisions and development review process improvements, support of public-private partnerships, and <br />implementation of educational programs for obtaining and maintaining housing. <br />2. Revise the expedited permitting process to identify and correct specific points where affordable housing <br />projects and permit reviews get slowed down. In this case, staff has already reviewed the issue and has made <br />internal changes to help to resolve. This included developing a new bright colored form specific for affordable <br />housing and sharing and coordinating with various reviewers from multiple departments. A liaison was also <br />established and it was requested that the departments and affordable housing developers reach out to the <br />liaison so that the liaison could help facilitate reviews and approvals and address any slow -downs in the review <br />process. <br />3 & 4. Revise the County's small lot subdivision regulations to allow even smaller lots to provide for <br />"shotgun" style homes and (4.) revise county planned development regulations and plat over -site -plan <br />regulations to restrict the ability of developers to build market rate housing on small lots intended for <br />affordable housing. These recommendations will require evaluation of and revision to several sections of the <br />County's Land Development Regulations and will require a feasibility analysis and coordination with various <br />departments (at least in the case of reducing lot sizes to less than the already small 50 -foot -wide lots). Lots of <br />less than 50 feet wide are not unheard of and have been developed in other communities in the state. Those <br />communities and their regulations could also be evaluated and government staff interviewed to identify <br />challenges that may be associated with the smaller lots to determine if they are a good option for Indian River <br />County. <br />S. Prepare information sheets and packets that review the local feasibility of developing tiny and modular <br />homes. The informational packets would be intended to explain what can and cannot be done in Indian River <br />County based on existing codes. The information could also help to facilitate development of these affordable <br />home options by providing resources and steps involved. As proposed, this recommendation would involve <br />some initial up -front staff time to develop and then very limited staff time thereafter other than for permit <br />review that already takes place for more traditionally built single family homes. <br />6. Modify the County's existing accessory dwelling regulations to allow larger units. Currently, the County's <br />accessory dwelling regulations allow for accessory housing units in agricultural, single-family, and multi -family <br />zoning districts throughout the County. Staff has found that the accessory dwelling regulations have rarely <br />been utilized by homeowners. Feedback on this issue has in part been attributed to the fact that accessory <br />dwellings are limited in size to no more than 33% of the heated/cooled gross floor area of the primary <br />Attachment 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.