My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2019-090
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2010's
>
2019
>
2019-090
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/27/2019 1:30:42 PM
Creation date
6/17/2019 11:08:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Plan
Approved Date
06/11/2019
Control Number
2019-090
Agenda Item Number
10.A.1.
Entity Name
IRC Comprehensive Plan 2030 (with RESO 2019-041)
Subject
Text Amendments for Capital Improvements and Transportation
Text of amendments sent to state and regional authority for approval before adoption
Document Relationships
2019-041
(Agenda)
Path:
\Resolutions\2010's\2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
202
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Comprehensive Plan <br />Transportation Element <br />the jurisdictions in the county, the Town of Orchid (pop. 307) and the Town of Indian River <br />Shores (pop. 3,722), have virtually no vacant developable land and do not plan to grow through <br />annexation. In addition, these communities have few county roadway links within their <br />boundaries. Therefore, concurrency management is relatively straightforward in these areas. The <br />County's concurrency management system utilizes adopted City of Vero Beach Levels of <br />Service. <br />For the Unincorporated area, the County continuously monitors concurrency through an automated <br />system that assigns background traffic and future trips to impacted roadway links. The system is <br />linked to the county's permitting system and is updated whenever new permits are issued. Since the <br />County issues building permits for the City of Vero Beach, projects within Vero Beach are also <br />included in the County's concurrency management system. <br />Recently, county staff and City of Sebastian staff initiated the process of evaluating the feasibility of <br />integrating the city's transportation concurrency management system with the county's system. <br />Although there are logistical obstacles to implementing a coordinated transportation concurrency <br />management system with Sebastian, the county and the city have already begun the process of <br />resolving those obstacles. Besides the county/City of Sebastian transportation concurrency <br />coordination initiative, a countywide transportation concurrency system initiative has also been <br />discussed. This discussion has occurred during the Interlocal Service Boundary Agreement (ISBA) <br />development process, a process involving the county and all five municipalities in the county. <br />Senate Bill 360, Florida's recently enacted Growth Management legislation, removes state - <br />mandated transportation concurrency requirements in targeted areas designated as Dense Urban <br />Land Areas (DULAs). Dense Urban Land Areas are cities and counties that have a minimum <br />population density of 1,000 persons per square mile. Pursuant to SB 360, each of the designated <br />jurisdictions becomes a Transportation Concurrency Exemption Area (TCEA) and can, if it desires, <br />amend its local comprehensive plan to eliminate its concurrency requirements. In Indian River <br />County, two cities, Sebastian and Vero Beach, qualify for the concurrency exemption provisions. <br />To ensure that the county adequately coordinates with cities on transportation concurrency issues, <br />the county should adopt a policy to coordinate with the municipalities to develop a common <br />methodology for measuring transportation impacts across jurisdictional boundaries. <br />In recent years, several proposed development projects in adjacent counties were large enough to <br />have significant traffic impacts on Indian River County. Those projects were all located in St. Lucie <br />and Brevard counties. Currently, there is little formal traffic impact coordination between Indian <br />River, Brevard, and St. Lucie counties, except with respect to Developments of Regional Impact. <br />For the last few years, Indian River County has informally discussed traffic study methodologies, <br />LOS standards, traffic count programs, and concurrency methodologies with Brevard and St. Lucie <br />counties. Through these discussions, the county has determined that there are substantial differences <br />in methodologies between the three counties, particularly with respect to their concurrency <br />management systems. Regardless, the county should adopt a policy to work with St. Lucie and <br />Brevard Counties to develop a common methodology for measuring transportation impacts among <br />all three counties. <br />Community Development Department Indian River County 76 <br />APPENDIX A — Transportation Amendments <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.