Laserfiche WebLink
Comprehensive Plan <br />Transportation Element <br />To promote economic development, improve air quality, and improve mobility for all of its <br />citizens, the county should adopt the highest possible level of service that is practical given the <br />existing conditions on the roadway network. Since large portions of the system already operate <br />at level of service "D" and since there is very little perceptual difference between "C" and "D" <br />on several classifications of roadways, the county should not attempt to raise its overall level of <br />service standard to "C". <br />• Roadway Levels of Service <br />In Indian River County, construction is underway or scheduled to begin shortly on a number of <br />major road projects, including widenings on CR 512; Oslo Road; 66th Avenue; SR 60; and US1. <br />When complete, these projects will forestall any additional LOS deficiencies on those roads through <br />the near term. These capacity increases were made possible by a substantial increase in traffic <br />impact fees imposed in 2004, by extension of the 1 cent local option sales tax, and by public/private <br />coordination in constructing transportation improvements. The county has not, however, imposed <br />other transportation revenue sources, such as the ELMS five cent local option gas tax. <br />Over the past decade, demand exceeding supply alone does not account for all of the decreases in <br />LOS in the county With the publication of the (2002)(2009) FDOT Quality and Level -of -Service <br />Handbook, Level -of -Service capacities in the generalized tables decreased for nearly all <br />classifications of roadways. While many of the capacities increased in the latest (2009)012) <br />FDOT handbook, the overall trend remains lower. For example, the peak hour directional capacity <br />at LOS "D" for a 4 -lane roadway with between 2 and 4.5 signals/mile dropped from 1,890 vehicle„ <br />in he ' 994 handbook 1,770 vehicles in the 2009 handbook to 477701630 vehicles in the 2009 2012 <br />handbook. Because the generalized tables are the basis of most of the county's LOS capacity <br />determinations, lower capacity volumes result in lower levels of service at the same traffic volume. <br />Despite the trend toward lower levels -of -service, no roadway segments in unincorporated Indian <br />River County actually exceed their adopted LOS standard. While several roadway segments exceed <br />Level of Service "D", those roadways are within their adopted standard. That is because the county <br />lowered the level of service standard to "E+20%" on portions of those roadways. Referenced in <br />Figure 4.2.2, Tthose roadways are 43rd Avenue and 27th Avenue in south Indian River County. It is <br />anticipated that this reduction in the adopted level -of -service standard will be a temporary measure <br />until those roadways can be widened or alternate road capacity provided. <br />Safety <br />On a regular basis, the county examines its crash records to identify those locations with high crash <br />occurrences. The county also seeks opportunities to improve safety in future roadway projects and <br />routinely examines existing travel conditions in order to improve deficiencies that may not yet be <br />reflected in crash statistics. As a result, both the crash rate per capita (.012) and the crash rate per <br />vehicle miles traveled (1 per 2,800 VMT) have remained constant over time in Indian River County. <br />While this does not indicate improved safety, it does indicate that safety is not getting worse. This is <br />significant in a climate of increasing congestion and population growth. Because the percentage of <br />Community Development Department Indian River County 74 <br />APPENDIX A — Transportation Amendments <br />