Laserfiche WebLink
8PECIAL:11441STRA1"1:;R2ECOMIMENDE,'D:.b.ECiSIOIV... <br />UA8•Petition •Nos..ipl, <br />bateof Hering::. ;'... <br />s;: <br />Attendees:.: : Pi ope-ty:Appra ser <br />• Apps se'r: . <br />T <br />.'Petitioner/Agent::: Did not Atte id. <br />B&Sic <br />and Underlyirig;Faacts : <br />• Th• e subt, <br />ecgfthe:hearin •�is:the Tangible Personal :Propeirty�(TPP)'..of ioeation::'' <br />wittiloilleja Coulity€ fhere:isone..0etition included in this report The Petitioner/Agent indicated:that. • <br />they did not: :wish to attend .t:he hearing, but Would': like= their evidence.to; .be considered:. (Ru e;112D <br />9.024(9)(a), F A;C.:.;A.I3earing.without one ofthe:.parties.in attendance preventsthe opposing party from <br />• cross-examination in.,determiningthe.sufficiency ofthe evidence ofthelnon=.app:earing.party ,(Rule::12D= <br />9.02.4(11),, i 'AcC.::.; bc'6hearing.:,was:comrraerced .a:nd:.the-; Property Appraisers'(PA) were .sworn :Ther;: <br />.Special- Magistrate gave a short overview of -:the 'procedures acid reed :an openi..rig.statement.:..(Rule.:.: <br />1.2D.9.024(4):& (6), F.A:C' <br />Theis <br />first issue.:to'.deterrriine whether. the PA establish ed: a Pres irript on of correctness. (Rule 1,2D <br />9.0240), F A C, Both1parties are responsible for presenting; relevant nd credible. evidence to"support <br />their'yaiues'.:.,':After:.feview, the. ,S pec al. :Magistttate,.must:cons:ider c.the.:. weight 9f;.the:evidence•:to':.a- <br />. standard of proof under F 5..194 301:and .110e.12D=9 025.(3)(b), F.A.C.. which is"preponderance. of the <br />- evidence" <br />Prop ert'-A raiser(PA <br />The•PAgave-an opening statement aead the assessed value for;:the;i etttias;follows: nd ron, - <br />. Petitioh°No <br />The 525,000.exemption wll.be:613plied.to:the assessed value: <br />The PA. presented>.bindersevidence.to-,be.'reviewed.::The:PAread:into::the:ieeo�d-their. process for.-. <br />each of. the 8th criteria consideration:and compliance with professionally: accepted appraisal.`practices <br />.through:.mass appraisal: (P:5': '193 01:1)r;The. PA considered tale three approaches to.value and.;. works <br />• toward: uniforkmty:;in jassessingother taxpayers: within Countyi :Also iricluded:'in;these binders _ ;: <br />are the .Tarn notices,; eturns :Account beta. Sheets: (record; arils); correspondence, life' assignments: for- <br />Orange County and DOR, Present Worth Tables,' Darden l incl udgment,: Market:Stud es, site,ii spection; <br />:photos.and previous VAB:tlecisions. lThe.PA stated. that they;acceptedhthe returns'. as:.filed.:Wh'en filing• <br />the'Returns, thePetiiner/Agent. used.basic descrptionsorporttie• assets. <br />• <br />'.The PA discussed thei':market studies used,to calibrate their depreciation schedules.'. When necessary;:: <br />- th.e PA will: adjust the% '.lives.to'cohforrri to. nevi: market data They requested frorii'the.Petitioner/Agent; <br />