My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/23/2019 (3)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2019
>
04/23/2019 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/31/2019 12:47:21 PM
Creation date
7/9/2019 11:14:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
07/02/2019
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
347
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
B-2. (refer to Appendix C, p. EX -05). Existing 16" transmission line on CR 510 to A -1-A, which <br />feeds an existing 8" line north to Windsor, and a new 16" line south to Sea Oaks and a new <br />tank (3 MG). New pumps to distribution mains: 8" exist line north to Disney, 12" new line south <br />to Old Winter Beach Road. <br />-(Tank delivery — 56 psi, Windsor — 16.7 psi, JI — 79.3 psi) <br />B-3. (refer to Appendix C, p. EX -06). All reuse to island fed from Hobart Tank and pumps. <br />There is not a new tank or pumps at Sea Oaks. Existing 16" transmission line on CR 510 to <br />A -1-A, which feeds the existing 8" line north to Windsor, and feeds both the new 16" line and <br />existing 8" line south to Sea Oaks (parallel mains), which reduces to a new 12" line from Sea <br />Oaks south to Old Winter Beach Road. <br />-(No Tank / Windsor : 16.7 psi / J1- 51.4 psi) <br />Note; B-2 provides the highest and most consistent pressures to all communities. B-3 provides <br />adequate flow and low but acceptable delivery pressure without a tank or pumps. <br />Scenario C: This model is the same estimated flow allocation as Scenario B, plus an additional <br />flow allocation into the COVB service area for the Shores arl&River Club developments (Total <br />flow allocation of 3.116 MGD: estimated 1.964 MGD flo t north barrier island communities <br />within IRCDUS service area, additional 1.0 MGD to JIB _nd n additional 0.153 MGD to COVB <br />service area - the Shores and River Club): <br />C-1. (refer to Appendix C, p. EX -07). Existing 16" transmission line on CR 510 to A -1-A, which <br />feeds a new 16" Transmission line southo Sea a aks� 'ti a new tank (3 MG). New Pumps at <br />Sea Oaks to distribution mains: 8" exist line (o h to w indsor, 12" new line south to Old Winter <br />Beach Road <br />-(Tank delivery : 49 psi / Wind <br />C-2. (refer to Appendix C, • EX - <br />feeds an existing 8" line <br />tank (3 MG). New pu ps <br />to Old Winter Beach Road <br />-(Tank delivery : 53 psi <br />ing 16" transmission line on CR 510 to A -1-A, which <br />r, and a new 16" line south to Sea Oaks and a new <br />tion mains: 8" exist line north to Disney, 12" new line south <br />r : 13.6 psi / JI : 77.8 psi) <br />C-3. (refer to Appendix C, p. EX -09). All reuse to island fed from Hobart Tank and pumps. <br />There is not a new tank or pumps at Sea Oaks. Existing 16" transmission line on CR 510 to <br />A -1-A, which feeds the existing 8" line north to Windsor, and feeds both the new 16" line and <br />existing 8" line south to Sea Oaks (parallel mains), which reduces to a new 12" line from Sea <br />Oaks south to Old Winter Beach Road. <br />-(No Tank / Windsor : 13.5 psi / J1: 46.6 psi) <br />Note: C-2 provides the highest and most consistent pressures to all communities. C-3 provides <br />adequate flow and low but acceptable delivery pressure without a tank or pumps. <br />Scenario D: This model is the same estimated flow allocation as Scenario C, plus additional flow <br />allocations into the COVB service area until the system failed. The purpose was to estimate the <br />maximum capacity of the transmission and distribution system on the North barrier Island <br />(Additional flows were incrementally increased in each version D-1, D-2 or D-3 below, until the <br />system failed to deliver flows at adequate pressures. Failure was considered to be a pressure <br />below the following: 10 psi at the top of the Wabasso bridge, 15 psi at the Sea Oaks tank, or 5 psi <br />at Windsor). The total flow allocation varies per model below, and included an estimated 1.964 <br />158 <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.