Laserfiche WebLink
Summary Information Regarding Significant Legislation <br />Legislation Failed <br />HB 15 (Local Government Fiscal Transparency) by Rep. Burton would require significant additional notice requirements for con- <br />sideration of tax increases and issuance of tax -supported debt. It requires local government to maintain a 5 -year voting record of <br />every vote on an action that would result in a tax increase or new debt; requires additional notices must be provided on the <br />web. The bill would require additional public hearings: a preliminary public hearing must be held 14 days prior to the public hearing <br />to vote on a tax increase or issuance of new debt and the public hearing to take the action must be noticed by a quarter page ad in a <br />newspaper of general circulation with a newly created notice inconsistent with the existing notice requirements for ordinances. It <br />creates a "debt affordability ratio" that must be calculated and included in notices. This bill passed the House on April <br />11. Companion bill, SB 1350 (Local Government Fiscal Transparency), was not heard in any Senate committee. <br />HB 7053 (Taxation Transparency) by the House Ways & Means Committee was heard in its final committee on Thursday, April 4; <br />but was never heard on the House floor or in Senate Committee. The bill would re -designate several state and local revenue <br />sources, requiring the names of those source to be changed from "fee" to "tax." The bill would require the following local revenue <br />source re -designations: <br />Special assessments or non -as valorem assessments would be retitled "special benefit tax"; <br />Impact fees and mobility fees would be retitled "development impact tax"; <br />Franchise fees would be retitled "franchise tax"; <br />Charges to pay the cost of regulation must be titled "in a manner reasonably consistent with the type of regulation and change <br />in question." <br />The bill was amended to more explicitly state that it does not affect a county's power under the constitution to impose non -tax levies <br />and expresses the Legislature's intent that such levies only be "titled and represented to the public as taxes." It was also amended <br />to clarify that the bill is not intended to affect existing case law and to require notices under s. 197.3635 to notice proposed or adopt- <br />ed "non -ad valorem assessments and special benefit taxes." <br />HB 3 (Preemption of Local Professional and Occupations Regulations and Licensing) The bill included a broad preemption of <br />any local government licensing requirements that are not expressly authorized by law and most special licenses. <br />Vacation Rentals <br />SB 824 (Private Property Rights of Homeowners) by Sen. Diaz and HB 987 (Public Lodging Establishments) by Rep. J. Grant would <br />have preempted regulation (inspection, licensing, occupancy limits) of short-term rentals to the state and would have required local <br />ordinances to apply uniformly to all residential properties. Additionally, the bills would have removed the grandfather clause allowing <br />for more stringent regulations in grandfathered local government. <br />Water Quality <br />Major water quality legislation did not pass this year, although both chambers proposed various legislation relating to septic tanks, <br />wastewater treatment, biosolids, basin management action plan (BMAP) requirements, and sewage spill notification requirements. <br />While there was movement on a consolidated water quality package late in session, ultimately nothing substantive made it across <br />the finish line, although the final budget does include funding for various water quality improvement measures. FAC expects many of <br />these issues to return next Session. <br />96 <br />17 <br />