Laserfiche WebLink
Comprehensive Plan <br />Transport a ll ion Ek m e n11 <br />tha juirisdiclions in 11a aounty, the Town of Orahid (pop. 307) and thea Tawn of Indian Rliver <br />Shares (pop. 3,722), t ave virtually no vacant devalopablea land and do vial plan to grove through <br />annaN aticin. In add it ion, thasca nam mun:il ieas have few caouinty rciadway links within tt air <br />boundaries. Ther(aforca, caoncurrcnay management is relatively straightforward in ltasa arenas. Me <br />County's conctrrcancy managemant sNstcam ut:iliaeas accipted Cit)I of Vero Beaah Llevals of <br />Sary icaa. <br />For tli a Uniniaorporadcc arcaa, the County cortint cit slly m anitars aonut rrenaN throe glt an autarnated <br />system than assigns baakgrounc traffic and futures trips to impacatac rciadwaN links. Thea systam :is <br />linked to the caounty's permiittling system and is updated whenciver neva flarmits are issued. Sinua the <br />County isst cis bt ilding permits for the C ity of Vero Beach, projacts witt in Varo Beach ares also <br />iniclt dead in the Count)I's (iciniaurrancy maniagament systam. <br />Rk caenl ly, caounty staff larc City cif Sc bastian staff in:il is tc c tt a procc ss cif evaluating the feasibility of <br />inlegrating the cait)I's transpartalion conaurrenay management sNstem with the county's system. <br />Alttciuigh thcre arc logistical obstacalcs to implemenfing a coordinated transpartationi acncurrency <br />manage me rt system with Sebastian, 1 he cot pity and the city have alrc ady t egun the procaess of <br />resolving tt cise obstacles. Bc s is es the aounty/City of Sebastian transpartalion cacir curre ncy <br />cocircinationi initiative, a coun"ide transpartalion conaurrenay systclm initialivc has also been <br />disausscc. This disaussioni has occurred during the Interlocal Scrvicae Boundar)l Agrccmc nt (118HA) <br />do Ne lopm enl praaess, a prose ss involving th a caounty ane al five mumialf alit:ie s in if. e county. <br />Senatc Bill 30, Florica's rcaerlly enaiatcld Growth Management lcgislalion, removes stale- <br />mandaled transportation conauirrenay requiremcnib in tailgeled arcas dcsignaled as Densc Urban <br />Hand Areas (IDLMAs). Dense Urtan Llanic Areas ane cities and caounties that tavc a minimum <br />population denisity of 1,000 pc rsonis pc r sett arc m ille. Pursuant to SH 30, c ach of the c e s ignaled <br />jurisdictions beacimes a Tkanisportation ConcurrencN ENiemplion Area (TC DA) and can, if it desires, <br />amend its lacaal comprehensive plan to eliminate its conaurrcncy requirements. In Indian River <br />County, two aities, Sctastian arc Vcro Beaah, qualify for tee (ionicaurrcniay exemption provisions. <br />To e nsure that the caount)I adegt ate ly aoordinatc s with cities on transportat:icn conaurrenay issues, <br />the cot my shouse adopt a pallay to coordinate with the mt niicipalities to develop a common <br />methodology for measuring tranisportation impacts across jurisdicat:icna boundaries. <br />In rc caenl years, sevc ral prcipcis e d development F Ircyc ats ini ad jacc nt cot nti e s were large c naugh to <br />have signlifiiaanl tiaffic impact9 on Indian River Count). Those projects were all located iin St. Llucie <br />anc Hrevarc counties. Currently, thcre is little formal traffic impact caoordination between Indian <br />Rover, Brevard, and St. Luaic aciunties, exeeptwitt resfleacl to Dcvelopmment9 of Rlegionall Impact. <br />For the last few years, Indian River County, has iniformallN ciscussed traffia study metlickclog:ies, <br />LOS stalndards, traffics aciuntprograms, and acncurrcncy melhodolagies with Hrevard and 91. Lucie <br />cot rtie s. Througt the se c i scussi ons, the aciunty has c etc rmiined than the re are st t stanti al differe ncc s <br />it methodologies NiMoan the lhrec aciunt:ies, partiatlarly with respect to 1heiir caoncurrency <br />manage me nt sN ste ms. Rlc gardlless, the aciunty should adopt a pcl icy to work witt St. Llucie and <br />Brcvard Cciunties to cevel op a aommon methocclogy fcw mcasuring tranisportalion impacts among <br />al l thre a count is s. <br />Com m unity Developm(nt Dc partm e a t Indian 1Rlivfar County R <br />A MINDIN A — Transports tion Am endme nts <br />