Laserfiche WebLink
Cam preihemsivu Alan <br />Transportations Elea curt <br />Overall, 1he tradel validalion process �rivcilved runnirig the f1SUBMS model to obtalin precicled <br />2010 rciadway traffic volumes aeric then ciamparirig those modell-predicled rciadway volumes <br />to actuall 220-0-01 2010 fie ld-colleoled traffic aciunls. Hased Lipari the corripeirisciri oft prcidicted to <br />observed volumes, minor Manges ware made to the model's parameters. This charige in <br />parameilars allowed the rricidal to aplplraximate plredieted rciadwery volumes to aalua'I rciadway <br />volumes. 'Ilhraugli this prone ss, an aacc pltab le proiciatc c-to-aetua l rated was cit ta' ine c . )Mitt this <br />procass complelle, the model was then.aonsidercc valid for iIhe purpose ofl predicting fUtdra <br />traffic levels using future -year sociacconomic data projections. <br />Ne eds A nalysis <br />The validated model was lhen ruri using 2#34-2040 socioeaonornia data and the cidsling and <br />commitlled road rietwork. 'phis modell ruin was performed to develop -2C4( traffia demand <br />proieations under the assumplion that rice capacity -producing rciadway improvements wauld to <br />mace from -20X1 to 2.0302G40. In Of er words, this modell rum asst ssed the impact of 20 <br />years ciflgrowth on the existing and committed roadway network. TN its mode 11 run alsa idaritified <br />roadway deficiencias resullting flrom the grciwf in travel demand ovar this 20 -year time peracid. <br />A cchaieml rciadway is defined as ariN rciadway having a level ciflscrvicc condiflon ftit exceeds <br />the aic cipted roadway perfbrmancc stalndard. With thus process, all defiiaic rit rciadways be aame <br />carididates for poteritial fulure road widening proieats avid were tested to dctermiine whether <br />irripraycrntrits were rieedcc to maintain the adapted levell ciflserviiice standards through the year <br />20-30204(l. <br />In Terms ofla tput, the traffic model projecils future Naar traffic volumes on all major rooks in the <br />count)l. For each rciadway on iIhe nctAcirk, 1he mccel uses the projecteid traffic 'Yalume (J"v") for <br />the road (produced by the modc 1) arse elf u maximum aceeptat le capaiait)l ("a"; of the road to <br />trarisformi east cifl these raw yalumc prajeetions inla more Uriccirslandablle volume to ac(ieptatle <br />caplacAN 11"v/c") ratio. lflthe v/c rartici exceeds 1.0, the traffic volume of a roadway segmient is <br />projected to exceed the aeceptalbk ciapacity ofl that rciadwery segmcrit. While a v/e cfl 1.0. <br />indicates ilhat iIhe traffic volume is _lust at the acceptable level of service, a roadway with a vla. <br />much Tess thari 1.0 fas exaess traffic aapaciiiN. In the latter case, more traffic could be <br />aacomrricidated, ane the rock would silill funclion at an adequate leve] oflserviee. <br />Coir it unity Dave lopment Departs c nt Indian River County 78 <br />A PHEN DIX A — Tlranspcirl ail i on A me ndmeml s <br />