My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2/7/1995
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1995
>
2/7/1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:05:10 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 2:14:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/07/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
119
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Boos 04 PACE 280 <br />property is eligible to be rezoned to any residential district up <br />to the requested RM -10. <br />ANALYSIS <br />In this section, an analysis of the reasonableness of the <br />application will be presented. The analysis will include a <br />description of: <br />• concurrency of public facilities; <br />• compatibility with the surrounding area; <br />• consistency -with the comprehensive plan; and <br />• potential impact on environmental quality. <br />Concurrency of Public Facilities <br />This site is located within the county Urban Service Area, an area <br />deemed suited for urban scale development. The Comprehensive Plan <br />establishes standards for: Transportation, Potable Water, <br />Wastewater, Solid Waste, Drainage and Recreation (Future Land Use <br />Policy 3.1). The adequate provision of these services is necessary <br />to ensure the continued quality of life enjoyed by the community. <br />The Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Regulations also <br />require that new development be reviewed to ensure that the minimum <br />acceptable standards for these services and facilities are <br />maintained. <br />Policy 3.2 of the Future Land Use Element states that no <br />development shall be approved unless it is consistent with the <br />concurrency management system component of the Capital Improvements <br />Element. For rezoning requests, conditional concurrency review is <br />required. <br />Conditional concurrency review examines the available capacity of <br />each facility with respect to a proposed project. Since rezoning <br />requests are not projects, county regulations call for the <br />concurrency review to be based upon the most intense use of the <br />subject property based upon the requested zoning district. <br />The site information used for the concurrency analysis is as <br />follows: <br />1. Size of Area to be Rezoned: ±27 acres <br />2. Existing Zoning Classification: RS -1, Single- Family <br />Residential District (up <br />to 1 units/acre) <br />3. Proposed Zoning Classification: <br />4. Most Intense Use of Subject <br />Property under Existing <br />Zoning Classification: <br />5. Most Intense Use of Subject <br />Property under Proposed <br />Zoning Classification: <br />Transportation <br />RM -10, Multiple -Family <br />Residential District (up <br />to 10 units/acre) <br />27 single-family units <br />270 single-family units <br />A review of the traffic impacts that would result from the <br />development of the property indicates that the existing level of <br />service "D" or better on Indian River Boulevard would not be <br />FEBRUARY 7, 1995 62 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.