My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2/7/1995
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1995
>
2/7/1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:05:10 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 2:14:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/07/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
119
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
bo 94 ep", 286 <br />167,597 cubic feet of runoff for the most intense use of the <br />property, and requiring that all finished floor elevations to be at <br />least six feet six inches above mean sea level. <br />As with all development, a more detailed review will be conducted <br />during the development approval process. <br />- Recreation <br />A review of county recreation facilities and the projected demand <br />that would result from the most intense development that could <br />occur on the property under the proposed zoning classification <br />indicates that the adopted levels of service would be maintained. <br />The table below illustrates the additional park demand associated <br />with the proposed development of the property and the existing <br />surplus acreage by park type. <br />Park Tvpe <br />Urban District <br />Community (south) <br />Beach <br />River <br />LOS <br />(Acres per <br />1000 population) <br />5.0 <br />1.25 <br />1.5 <br />1.5 <br />Project <br />Demand <br />Surplus <br />Acres <br />Acreage <br />3.11 <br />191.256 <br />0.78 <br />9.535 <br />0.93 <br />67.777 <br />0.93 <br />28.773 <br />Based upon the analysis conducted, staff has determined that all <br />concurrency -mandated facilities, including drainage, roads, solid <br />waste, recreation, water, and wastewater have adequate capacity to <br />accommodate the most intense use of the subject property under the <br />proposed zoning. Therefore, the concurrency test has been <br />satisfied for the subject request. <br />Consistency with Comprehensive Plan <br />Rezoning requests are reviewed for consistency with all policies of <br />the comprehensive plan. Rezoning requests must. also. be consistent <br />with the overall designation of land uses as depicted on the Future <br />Land Use. Map, which includes agricultural, residential, <br />recreational, conservation, and commercial and industrial land uses <br />and their densities. Commercial and industrial land uses are <br />located in nodes throughout the unincorporated areas of Indian <br />River County. <br />The goals, objectives. and policies are the most important parts of <br />the comprehensive plan. Policies are statements in the plan which <br />identify the actions which the county will take in order to direct <br />the community's development. As courses of action committed to by <br />the county, policies provide the basis for all county land <br />development related decisions. While all comprehensive plan <br />policies are important, some have more applicability than others in <br />reviewing rezoning requests. Of particular applicability for this <br />request are the following policies and objective. <br />Future Land Use Element Policy 1.14 <br />Future Land Use Element Policy 1.14 states that the M-2, Medium - <br />Density Residential -2, land use designation is intended for <br />residential uses with densities up to ten units/acre. In addition, <br />that policy states that these residential uses must be located <br />within an existing or future urban service area. <br />Since the subject property is located within an area designated as <br />M-2 on the county's future land use plan map and is located within <br />the county's urban service area, and the proposed zoning district <br />would permit residential uses no denser than ten units/acre, the <br />FEBRUARY 7, 1995 68 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.