My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2/14/1995
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1995
>
2/14/1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:05:10 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 2:15:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/14/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BOpK. 9 PuA44 <br />c). Tax-exempt paper is significantly impacted by the local government - <br />environment. An example of this is in late December and the <br />beginning of January, tax exempt bonds had a higher than usual <br />interest rate because of the Orange County derivative situation. <br />d). Tax-exempt interest costs include bond issuance costs in addition to <br />the project cost. An estimate would have to be made on how much <br />issuance cost would have to be attributed to the project (i.e. bond <br />counsel, underwriter, issurer, fed fund rate, financial advisor, etc.). <br />3. Why a fixed not variable rate? <br />We feel a fixed rate is better for the following reasons: <br />a). We can tell individuals what their payment will be up front for <br />the term of the loan and they can include this in their <br />household budget. They have a known amount they can count <br />on. <br />b). Raising interest rates is never an easy decision for the Board <br />of County Commissioners. If we changed to a variable rate <br />every individuals assessment would change on an annual basis. <br />Second, raising interest rates is never popular and you would <br />eventually affect every assessment roll that has been passed for <br />the last 10 years, 5 years or 2 years. <br />4. Why is the interest rate set at 2 percent above prime? <br />The interest rate was set at 2 percent above prime for the following reasons: <br />a). The County did not want to take business away from banks or <br />compete with banks but still needed to make financing <br />available for those who could not get a conventional loan. <br />Most people who would finance the assessments or utility <br />impact fees would do so through a second mortgage or a <br />home equity loan. Home equity loans and second mortgages <br />are usually approximately 2 percent above prime. <br />b). We also needed a differential for bad debt expense to help to <br />fund the cost of delinquent and non -payers. <br />c). In the past, when we did large bond issues for assessment <br />projects' (i.e. North County assessment project) the bond <br />industry usually required the County to charge those being <br />assessed 2 percent above the bond issue interest rate so there <br />was sufficient money available to make timely debt service <br />payments. (Once again 2 percent was a factor they used for <br />delinquent payers and the expense affiliated with them.) Since _ <br />the - bond industry found 2 percent to be a prudent business <br />rule of thumb, we adopted the same policy. <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />Staff feels that prime rate is the best benchmark. If the Board of County Commissioners feels that <br />2% above prime is too high then they should consider reducing the rate to 1 percent or 0 percent <br />above prime; however, we feel prime should remain as the benchmark. <br />FEBRUARY 14, 1995 14 <br />M M <br />M <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.