Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Himanshu Mehta, P.E. Managing Director <br />7 November 2019 <br />Page 2 <br />(i.e., dewatering liquids) from the RDF are transmitted via force main to the West Regional <br />Wastewater Treatment Facility (WRWWTF) for treatment and disposal. <br />On February 19, 2019, SWDD authorized Geosyntec, under CCNA 2018 Work Order No. 4, to <br />evaluate landfill liquids management alternatives for the IRC Landfill. The purpose of the study <br />was to evaluate options for reducing the nutrient loading from the Landfill leachate and RDF <br />centrate that are potentially impacting the stringent permit conditions at the WRWWTF. The study <br />focused on: (i) review of the liquid chemistry and flow data; (ii) an evaluation of liquids <br />management options; (iii) discussion of conceptual costs; (iv) summary of findings; and (v) <br />recommendations. The results of the study were presented in a technical memorandum that was <br />submitted to SWDD on 3 July 2019. <br />Based on an evaluation of leachate characteristics from the April 2019 sampling compared to <br />historical analytical data, arsenic (As), total nitrogen (TN) and total dissolved solids (TDS) were <br />found to exceed the local limits and would therefore require pretreatment prior to continued <br />discharge to the WRWWTF. Also, based on a review of historical Landfill leachate flow data <br />from June 2016 to February 2019, a peak daily flow rate of 20,000 gallons per day (gpd) was used <br />for the evaluation of leachate management options. <br />Two primary leachate treatment/management strategies (i.e., onsite treatment and leachate <br />evaporation) were evaluated in the study. The evaluated onsite treatment approach involved the <br />use of a biological system (Membrane Bioreactor [MBR]) combined with Reverse Osmosis (RO) <br />for the removal of the constituents to below the local limits required by the WRWWTF. One <br />vendor of biological and/or physical treatment systems (i.e., Dynatec Systems, Inc. of Burlington, <br />NJ) was contacted to provide the conceptual design and cost estimate to manage 20,000 gpd of <br />leachate. The second alternative evaluated is liquids volume reduction via onsite evaporation. <br />Two vendors of thermal leachate evaporator systems (APTIM of Acworth, GA and Heartland <br />Water Technology, Inc. of Hudson, MA) were contacted to provide conceptual designs and cost <br />estimates for systems to manage 20,000 gpd of leachate. Geosyntec utilized the data provided by <br />these vendors to prepare capital and O&M comparison cost estimates for the management of <br />leachate from the Landfill. <br />Based on the technical and economic evaluations presented in the study, there is a potential that <br />leachate evaporation using the Heartland system could be a cost -competitive alternative to onsite <br />treatment and continued discharge of pretreated effluent to the WRWWTF. To better evaluate the <br />feasibility of leachate evaporation, a pilot study in cooperation with Heartland was recommended. <br />Geosyntec understands that Heartland, in collaboration with Indian River Eco District, LLC <br />(IRED) of Lufkin, Texas, are interested in installing a leachate evaporator system at the adjacent <br />property currently owned by the IRED. Therefore, SWDD has solicited a proposal from IRED <br />