My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06/04/2019 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2019
>
06/04/2019 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/31/2019 1:04:50 PM
Creation date
12/9/2019 4:21:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
06/04/2019
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
201
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
May 9, 2019 <br />Mr. Drew Petonick <br />Outside Sales <br />Ferguson Waterworks <br />1950 NW 18th St <br />Pompano Beach, FL 33069 <br />drew.petonick@ferguson.com <br />Reference: Decision Regarding Protest of Indian River County Bid 2019048 <br />Dear Mr. Petonick: <br />We are in receipt of your email of May 7, 2019 protesting the "award" of the subject bid. After review, the <br />protest made by Ferguson Waterworks ("Ferguson") is denied. <br />Background <br />Your protest asserts Ferguson's failure to provide its bid form electronically as a Microsoft Excel file is a "minor <br />technicality and "does not constitute" the disqualification of your bid. <br />Your protest also asserts Ferguson was "low overall bidder", and "clearly... low on a significant amount of ... <br />items", based on the initial bid tabulation released immediately after the bid opening and prior to verification <br />of the contents of the USB drives submitted, and awarding to Core & Main, LP ("Core & Main") would be a <br />"reckless use of tax payers money". <br />Finally, your protest states to "award the entire bid to one unopposed party is unjust" and requests your bid be <br />reinstated for consideration or all bids be rejected due to lack of competition and the items be rebid. <br />Basis for Denial of Protest <br />The technical specifications within the bid documents state "The following documents must be submitted to <br />the Purchasing Division prior to the due date and time: <br />• Completed, printed and executed Bid Form <br />• A CD or USB thumb drive with the completed Microsoft Excel Bid Form in excel (not pdf)..." <br />The omission of items identified as mandatory to a bid (such as the executed bid form) is not considered a <br />technicality, but rather a failure to be responsive to the requirements of the bid. The Purchasing Manual <br />defines a responsive bidder as: "a bidder whose bid, proposal or submittal complies in all material respects <br />with the bid invitation or solicitation request, as determined by the County." The Excel bid form was identified <br />in the bid documents (as provided above) as a material requirement, and therefore Ferguson's failure to <br />provide it renders your bid non-responsive. <br />Your assertion that Ferguson was the lower of the two bids initially considered responsive during the public bid <br />opening, and that your line item pricing was lower on many items is unfounded. The total from the bid forms <br />132 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.