Laserfiche WebLink
except the Sheriff. As shown in table 6.5, $30,631,940 was spent on general government services in <br />FY 2017/.18. Between fiscal years 2012/13 and 2017/18, general government expenditures increased <br />by 39.46%. In FY 2017/18, general government services represented 12.23% of all county expenses. <br />Public Safety <br />The Sheriff s Department, Fire Services, Advanced Life Support, Emergency Management, and the <br />Medical Examiner fall under the category of Public Safety. As shown in table 6.5, the county, in FY <br />2017/18, spent $92,695,363 for public safety services. Since FY 2012/13, public safety expenditures <br />have increased by 38.54%. Public safety represented 37.0% of all county expenses in FY 2016/17. <br />Physical Environment <br />The physical environment classification encompasses the county's water and waste water utilities, the <br />Solid Waste Disposal District (SWDD), the Soil and Water Conservation District, and the <br />Environmentally Sensitive Land Acquisition Fund. Table 6.5 shows that $59,317,463 was spent on <br />these activities in FY 2017/18. Since FY 2012/13, physical environment expenditures have increased <br />by 27.10%. Physical environment services represented 23.68% of all county expenses in FY 2017/18. <br />Transportation <br />Departments under the transportation category include Road and Bridge, County Engineering, <br />Secondary Roads Construction, and Traffic Engineering. Those departments are responsible for <br />designing, constructing, overseeing, and maintaining the county's roads and drainage systems. As <br />shown in table 6.5, the county spent $31,359,379 on transportation facilities in FY 2017/18. Since FY <br />2012/13, transportation expenditures have decreased by 16.79%. Transportation expenses represented <br />12.52% of all county expenses in FY 2017/18. <br />Economic Environment <br />Included in the economic environment category are the costs of providing services which develop <br />and improve the economic condition of the community and its citizens. Up to June 30, 2011, <br />Veteran Services, the Housing Authority, and the Economic Development Division of the Indian <br />River County Chamber of Commerce primarily undertook that function. On July 1, 2011, the <br />Housing Authority was officially separated from the County; consequently, its expenditures are <br />no longer reported here. Table 6.5 shows that $426,085 was spent on economic environment <br />services in FY 2017/18. Since FY 2012/13, economic environment expenditures have decreased <br />by 83.49%. Economic environment expenses represented 0.17% of all county expenses in <br />FY2017/18. Higher expenses between FY 2011/12 and FY 2013/14 were the result of expenditure <br />of Neighborhood Stabilization Program Community Development Block Grant funds, one time <br />grants provided to lessen the negative effects of the economic downturn/recession and housing <br />collapse. <br />179 <br />