My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2020-038
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2020's
>
2020
>
2020-038
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/12/2022 3:25:06 PM
Creation date
3/9/2020 12:42:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Grant
Approved Date
03/03/2020
Control Number
2020-038
Agenda Item Number
8.K.
Entity Name
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)
Subject
Subaward and Grant Agreement Z1630 for Hurricane Dorian damages
Project Number
Z1630
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
A TRUE COPY <br />CERTIFICATION ON LAST PAGE <br />J.R. SMITH, CLERK <br />Attachment J <br />DHS OIG AUDIT ISSUES and ACKNOWLEDGEMENT <br />The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Office of Inspector General (OIG) was tasked by <br />Congress to audit all FEMA projects for fiscal year 2014. A synopsis of those findings are listed <br />below: <br />There have been 32 separate instances where Grantees/Recipients or Sub -Recipients did not follow the <br />prescribed rules to the point that the OIG believed the below listed violations could have nullified the <br />FEMA/State agreement. <br />1. Non Competitive contracting practices. <br />2. Failure to include required contract provisions. <br />3. Failure to employ the required procedures to ensure that small, minority, and women's owned firms <br />were all given fair consideration. <br />4. Improper "cost -plus -a -percentage -of -cost" contracting practices. <br />The following information comes directly from DHS's OIG Audit Tips for Managing Disaster Related <br />Project Costs; Report Number OIG -16-109-D dated July 1, 2016. The following may be reasons for <br />the disallowance or total de -obligation of funding given under the FEMA/State agreement: <br />1. Use of improper contracting practices. <br />2. Unsupported costs. <br />3. Poor project accounting. <br />4. Duplication of benefits. <br />5. Excessive equipment charges (applicability may vary with hazard mitigation projects). <br />6. Excessive labor and fringe benefit charges. <br />7. Unrelated project costs. <br />8. Direct Administrative Costs. <br />9. Failure to meet the requirement to obtain and maintain insurance. <br />Key Points that must be followed when Administering FEMA Grants: <br />• Designate one person to coordinate the accumulation of records. <br />• Establish a separate and distinct account for recording revenue and expenditures, and a separate <br />identifier for each specific FEMA project. <br />• Ensure that the final claim for each project is supported by amounts recorded in the accounting <br />system. <br />• Ensure that each expenditure is recorded in the accounting books and references supporting <br />sources of documentation (checks, invoices, etc.) that can be readily retrieved. <br />• Research insurance coverage and seek reimbursement for the maximum amount. Credit the <br />appropriate FEMA project with that amount. <br />71 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.