My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/7/1995
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1995
>
3/7/1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:05:10 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 2:18:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BOOK 94 PING, 508 <br />2. At the December 13, 1994 meeting of the Board of County Commissioners, <br />the Board approved the distribution and use of the Piper proceeds. This <br />entry reflects the approved allocation of those proceeds. <br />3. The attached budget amendment appropriates funding for 1994/95 salary <br />raises as approved by the Board of County Commissioners at the December <br />13, 1994 meeting. <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the attached budget amendment <br />009. <br />Commissioner Eggert asked if an additional Planner II would be <br />adequate staffing on the MPO, and Community Development Director <br />Robert Keating explained that the MPO is compensating the County <br />for what we have been doing for a number of years, such as $40,000 <br />a year for traffic engineering. Other areas are normal <br />transportation planning and committee work, and the MPO allows us <br />to use federal funds. We have not staffed up as much as some of <br />the MPOs in other counties. <br />Director Keating advised that he didn't ask for an additional <br />clerical position because in recent years a lot of the planners do <br />their own word processing. He felt an additional planner would be <br />advantageous all the way around. He noted that we are accounting <br />for all the work going into MPO and we have a lot more control in <br />planning the projects. <br />Commissioner Adams asked if in doing that we are taking <br />dollars away from projects, and Director Keating responded <br />negatively. He advised that tomorrow the DOT will be presenting <br />two SR -60 projects, and through the MPO we do have a lot of control <br />because the DOT has a lot of constraints in the procedures they <br />must follow. <br />Commissioner Eggert commented that our control is through not <br />doing anything to the roads. We are down to 6-8 median closings on <br />the first SR -60 project instead of 12 as the DOT first proposed. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved <br />Budget Amendment 009: <br />8 <br />March 7, 1995 <br />� � r <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.