11/19/2019 (2) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Innovative Technologies — These were not evaluated. DEP is not aware of a technology used at full scale for any extended time period, and so does not have enough information to make an analysis. G. An analysis of the impact on small business as defined by s. 288.703, F.S., and an analysis of the impact on small counties and small cities as defined by s. 120.52, F. S. (Includes: • Why the regulation is needed (e.g., How will the regulation make the regulatory process more efficient? Required to meet changes in federal law? Required to meet changes in state law?], - This regulation is needed to reduce the quantities of nutrients, particularly phosphorus, that potentially impact Florida's waters. Degradation of water quality results in algae blooms and potentially reduced tourism and recreational activities. Although the implementation of the rule will adversely affect certain small businesses and counties, it will serve to protect the interests of other small businesses and counties. • The type of small businesses that would be subject to the rule; Private biosolids treatment facilities, septage management facilities, biosolids transporters; and ranchers and farmers. • Many biosolids land application sites (ranchers and farmers) may cease accepting biosolids which not only affect them financially, but also affect the biosolids treatment facilities and septage management facilities who use the sites. • Small biosolids treatment facilities may close if they cannot acquire land application sites or afford to permit new sites. • Septage management facilities may close, meaning septage would need to be transported long distances to other suitable facilities. • The probable impact on affected small businesses [e.g., increased reporting requirements increased staffing; increased legal or accounting fees?], Because the revised rule could result in significantly reduced biosolids land application rates, significant amounts of additional land will need to be acquired. This could increase permitting costs and operational costs. Additionally, some sites may not comply with the seasonal high water table requirements or may stop accepting biosolids; as mentioned previously, it may be necessary to procure additional land, likely at farther distances than current sites. Additional monitoring requirements will increase operational costs. These costs may result in an untenable situation for some biosolids treatment facilities and septage management facilities, which could cause them to close. Lastly, the reduction in biosolids application rates, as well as the potential loss of biosolids, will result in the loss of a valuable fertilizer resource, cost savings, and crop production (hay/pasture) for ranchers and farmers. • The likely per -firm regulatory cost increase, if any). This depends of the type of operation, the size of the site or facility, and the location of the facility. 147