Laserfiche WebLink
Z No good ,faith written proposals for a lower cost regulatory alternative to the <br />proposed rule were received. <br />i <br />❑ See attachment "A". <br />❑ Adoptled in entirety. <br />❑ Adopted / rejected in part. (Provide a description of the parts adopted orrejected, and provide <br />a brief statement of the reasons adopting or rejecting this alternative. in part). <br />❑ Rejected in entirety. (Provide a brief statement of the reasons rejecting this alternative). <br />❑ See attachment "B". <br />❑ Adopted in entirety. <br />❑ AdopteId / rejected in part. (Provide a description of the parts adopted orrejected, and provide <br />a brief statement of the reasons adopting or rejecting this alternative in part). <br />❑ Rejected in entirety. (Provide a brief statement of the reasons rejecting this alternative). <br />I <br />❑ See attachment "C". <br />❑ Adopted in entirety. <br />❑ Adopted / rejected in part. (Provide a description of the parts adopted orrejected, and provide <br />a brief statement of the reasons adopting or rejecting this alternative in part). <br />❑ Rejected in entirety. (Provide a brief statement of the reasons rejecting this alternative). <br />❑ See attachment "D". <br />❑ Adoptedi in entirety. <br />i <br />❑ Adopted)/ rejected in part. (Provide a description of the parts adopted orrejected, and provide <br />a brief statement of the reasons adopting or rejecting this alternative in part). <br />Rejected)i in entirety. (Provide a brief statement of the reasons rejecting this alternative). <br />❑ See attachment "E". <br />❑ Adopted in entirety. <br />i <br />❑ Adopted /, rejected in part. (Provide a description of the parts adopted orrejected, and provide <br />a brief statement) of the reasons adopting or rejecting this alternative in part). <br />150 <br />