My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/19/2019 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2019
>
11/19/2019 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/20/2020 10:25:07 AM
Creation date
3/20/2020 10:21:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
11/19/2019
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
321
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
12.G.1. FDEP Biosolids Rule <br />,I <br />If one reads FDEP'slIproposed Biosolids Rule, one cannot come away knowing that the <br />environment is protected. The language is to convoluted and open to multiple interpretations. <br />Ask three people toi read the Rule and one will get three very different explanations of what it <br />means. <br />At a minimum, I would suggest: <br />I <br />1) That the Boallyd authorize the Utilities to submit its comments to FDEP. <br />2) That the board authorize the Chair.................. to submit comments on behalf <br />of the board Noting: <br />a. That the proposed rule does not go far enough to clearly protect the environment. <br />b. That the law is to convoluted, unclear and to open to multiple interpretations to be <br />good law.! <br />c. That a simple, clear and understandable solution that will protect the environment is <br />available and found in Rule no. 62-640.400 (12) so essentially, Land application of <br />biosolids will not be permitted anywhere in the State of Florida unless the applicant <br />for a site permit affirmatively demonstrates that and phosphorus loads will not add <br />to nitrogen and phosphorus loadings in the watershed. <br />d. If FDEP wil!il not recommend the suggested language, then given the conditions <br />around the Blue Cypress Lake, which mirror near exactly what science has:-already <br />established are such that will lead to significant environmental damage with the <br />dumping of biosolids, at least clearly carve out Indian River County and the <br />headwaters of the St. Johns River with the affirmatively demonstrates language <br />above and allow IRC to maintain its moratorium on the dumping of biosolids. <br />/3) ,. I,f-the provision! of the rule that gives present permit holders three more years to dump <br />Biosolids on lands that will pollute the environment remains in the rule for Indian River <br />County, I suggeist that we ask the County Attorney to start investigating what causes of <br />action we may have in law to file against anyone who does come into Indian River <br />County and knowingly dumps biosolids, which present science makes clear, will pollute <br />our environment. <br />I <br />Given all we are paying and will pay to remediate the damage that pollutants have done to the <br />Lagoon, we cannot afford another $100,000,0000 remediation project to clean up the Blue <br />Cypress Lake area. If FIDiEP is not going to do its job and protect the environment, we need to be <br />prepared to step up and protect the natural resources of Indian River County. <br />164 - f <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.