Laserfiche WebLink
used as part of the operation's haul route. Instead, 5th <br />Street S.W. will be improved and used by the applicant. <br />The haul route for the project involves the use of 82nd <br />Avenue, which currently functions as a truck route for <br />citrus trucks and landfill traffic. <br />3. The required 150' setback from the mining pit to <br />perimeter property boundaries is provided, and mounded <br />spoil areas and on-site driveways are proposed to be <br />located between the pit and adjacent properties to the <br />east and west. Because the mining operation site abuts <br />only agriculturally designated property, no buffers are <br />required. The applicant, however, indicates that some <br />existing citrus trees will be left standing along the <br />site's east and west perimeters. <br />ANALYSIS: <br />Sand mining operations are necessary for development in the county <br />since almost all developments, from single family homes to large <br />commercial projects, require fill. Although mining operations are <br />necessary, the county's Comprehensive Plan and LDRs restrict mining <br />operations to the county's agriculturally designated/zoned areas. <br />Mining operations are restricted to these areas for several <br />reasons. First, mining operations require large areas of land <br />where sand, marl, or fill material is available in large <br />quantities. Such areas are readily available in the agricultural <br />zoning districts. Second, agricultural areas are the lowest <br />density areas in the county. Therefore, locating such operations <br />in agricultural areas limits the number of residences that could be <br />potentially impacted and places such uses in areas where the <br />existence of large parcels tends to result in greater setbacks <br />between adjacent uses (e.g. residences from mining operations). <br />Third, where mining operations are proposed outside of the Urban <br />Service Area in an agriculturally designated area (such as the <br />proposed Rebel Ranch mine site), it is likely that the area will <br />remain agricultural and low in density for the life of the sand <br />mine operation. Thus, it would be unlikely that, over time, <br />residential development would locate adjacent to the mine in a <br />manner that could increase potential incompatibilities between the <br />mining operation and new residences. Fourth, mining operations are <br />similar in intensity to many of the agricultural operations allowed <br />in all of the agricultural districts. Although all activities in <br />these districts are characterized by significant expanses of open <br />space, many allowable and appropriate agricultural activities can <br />be intensive in terms of equipment use, maintenance activities, and <br />hours of operation. General farming, citrus production, livestock <br />raising, fish farms, kennels and animal boarding, and nurseries are <br />all allowable agricultural activities that can be intensive in <br />nature. It is staff's position that, like other intensive <br />agricultural activities, mining is an appropriate use in the <br />agricultural zoning districts. <br />It should be noted that in addition to sites located in <br />agricultural zoning districts, the LDRs allow mining activities, <br />for a maximum period of 2 months, where such activity is incidental <br />to an approved development project. An example of such incidental <br />mining activity is where a lake is proposed for a development and <br />the material removed during the creation of the lake is transported <br />off-site for fill material. <br />39 <br />March 14, 1995 bou <br />FA.;L <br />