My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/14/2020 (3)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2020's
>
2020
>
01/14/2020 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/19/2020 12:40:55 PM
Creation date
5/20/2020 10:53:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/14/2020
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
142
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
On January 7th, 2020 the Board approved the 58th Avenue Corridor Study/S.C.A.L.E. Report. The acronym <br />S.C.A.L.E., (Safety, Cost, Alternate Alignments, Long Range Planning, and Environmental Considerations) <br />is used to identify the five factors necessary for the most feasible alignment of a roadway. This report is <br />necessary for eminent domain proceedings to show that these aspects have been considered, along with <br />negotiations with the property owner that the County has acted in good faith to acquire the necessary <br />property for right-of-way prior to starting the eminent domain process. <br />On January 7th, 2020 the Board also approved an unconditional offer for right-of-way located at 4740 58' <br />Avenue that is owned by Paulette Brown. Staff started negotiations with Ms. Brown back in October of <br />2018. However, staff was never able to negotiate an acceptable settlement with Ms. Brown and her <br />attorney so we had no choice but to move forward with the first step in the eminent domain process. <br />This is an example of the use of eminent domain when a fair and reasonable agreement can't be reached <br />with the property owner. Staff plans to continue to consider eminent domain in cases where the County <br />is unable to recommend an amicable purchase arrangement. <br />Past direction from the Board has been to negotiate with the property owner and their attorney to come <br />to a fair settlement that will save the taxpayers money and provide the property owner with some <br />comfort that the County did the best we could to ease the emotional impact on the property owner <br />during the right-of-way acquisition process. County staff believes that we have been following past Board <br />direction with regards to right-of-way acquisition. <br />It is important to consider that right-of-way costs make up a significant portion of the costs to construct <br />capacity increasing projects like road widening. The last impact fee study, completed in 2014, right-of- <br />way costs were 25.7% of the total cost of improvements. As a result, increases in right-of-way costs <br />result in higher impact fee calculations. Whether funded by impact fees, gas taxes, or the Optional Sales <br />Tax, higher right-of-way costs reduce the amount of road construction that can be funded with available <br />resources. <br />FUNDING <br />No funding is needed for this report. <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />Staff recommends that the Board direct staff to continue with the current method of right-of-way <br />acquisition, which includes the use of eminent domain proceedings if an agreement to a purchase right- <br />of-way at a fair price is not obtainable. <br />ATTACHMENTS <br />66th Avenue (South of 415t St. — 57th St.) ROW Purchases <br />66th Avenue (49th Street — 85th Street) ROW Purchases <br />APPROVED AGENDA ITEM FOR: JANUARY 14, 2020 <br />51 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.