Laserfiche WebLink
ISA <br />MEMORANDUM <br />TO: Board of County Commissioners <br />FROM: Dylan Reingold, County Attorney <br />DATE: December 31, 2019 <br />SUBJECT: Indian River County et al., v. United States Department of Transportation, et al. <br />BACKGROUND. <br />On March 17, 2015, the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners (the "Board") authorized <br />the County Attorney's Office to file a complaint in federal court challenging the U.S. Department of <br />Transportation's ("USDOT' s") approval of the issuance of the $1.75 billion of tax exempt private activity <br />bonds for the All Aboard Florida project. On March 24, 2015, the Board authorized the County <br />Attorney's Office to include the Emergency Services District as a plaintiff in the case. As the Board is <br />aware, as a result of the decision in that case, the USDOT withdrew its private activity bond allocation for <br />Phase II of the All Aboard Florida project. <br />On December 19, 2017, the Board authorized the County Attorney's Office to file a lawsuit against the <br />USDOT in conjunction with issuance of the Record of Decision for Phase II of the All Aboard Florida <br />project. On February 13, 2018, Martin County, Indian River County and CARE -FL filed a lawsuit in <br />federal court challenging the validity of the private activity bonds and the National Environmental Policy <br />Act ("NEPA") process for Phase II of the All Aboard Florida project. Martin County and CARE -FL have <br />since withdrawn from the case. The court held an oral argument on the motions for summary judgment on <br />November 27, 2018. On December 24, 2018, the court issued an opinion granting Defendants' Motion for <br />Summary Judgment, granting Intervenor -Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, and denying Indian <br />River County's Motion for Summary Judgment. <br />On February 5, 2019, the Board voted to file an appeal with the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals. Oral <br />arguments were held on September 24, 2019. Although the County had meritorious claims on appeal <br />relating to the illegality of the private activity bonds and the insufficient NEPA analysis performed by the <br />Federal Railroad Administration, on December 20, 2019, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals denied the <br />appeal. <br />57 <br />