My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/21/1995
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1995
>
3/21/1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:05:10 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 2:20:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/21/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
boa 94 PAGE 656 <br />Director Pinto explained that the development would not be <br />allowed to be developed today under the present conditions as other <br />new developments must have water and sewer systems. The County's <br />Comprehensive Plan deemed that utilities are to be required in new <br />developments. The County, however, has decided not to provide a <br />sewer system at this time due to the cost. Water is required as <br />each project is built out as it was determined that allowing wells <br />causes substandard water quality problems. <br />Commissioner Adams added that the regulations go back to the <br />Clean Water Act. She felt it is ironic that the areas chosen to <br />receive water usually have the least ability to pay the impact fees <br />and costs. People move into those areas because of affordable <br />housing and then mandates are imposed. She stressed that she does <br />not know what the answer is but the more she hears about people <br />living on fixed incomes trying to pay the costs of these projects, <br />the more she is convinced that government somehow has to come up <br />with a method to assist in the cost because the projects are for <br />the benefit of the people. <br />Director Pinto advised that the terms are at the discretion of <br />the Board as far as the interest rate and length of time allowed <br />for payment of fees and charges. However, the figures have been <br />analyzed and a determination was made that in financing the best <br />buy is over a 10 -year period. After 10 years, the interest rate <br />takes away any benefit of an extended payment period. He also <br />reminded the Board that the development had been initiated with a <br />plan for utilities, either by the County or a private utility, but <br />the private utility had never collected any fees. <br />Chairman Macht recalled that GDC's plan had substantial rate <br />increases which the County was able to reduce considerably. <br />Commissioner Bird believed that purchasers prefer to have a <br />house on a municipal water system rather than to take a chance on <br />a well and that, in general, the value is recovered on resale of <br />the home. <br />Ms. Volk wanted to know whether she would still have to pay <br />the impact fee if she chose not to connect to the water system. <br />Chairman Macht pointed out that the investment would be <br />returned in the sale of the property and that the gain is in <br />reliability and safety. The fire protection system also impacts on <br />the insurance costs. County water is very good water, better than <br />the great majority of systems, as it comes through reverse osmosis, <br />which is very close to nature's way and which has become a world <br />standard. <br />Ms. Volk appreciated Commissioner Adams' concern for the cost <br />and stated that, as a single parent, it is certainly a financial <br />hardship. She understands it will increase the value of her home, <br />MARCH 21, 1995 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.