Laserfiche WebLink
BOOK 9 pw 700 <br />The Indian River County Board of County Commissioners accepted the Beach <br />Committee's recommendation and hired American Coastal Engineering to Design, Permit <br />and Construct the P.E.P. reef. Staff was instructed to assist with the design and permitting <br />of the reef. Since the hiring of American Coastal Engineering in September of 1993, the <br />County has commissioned several field investigations, background studies and ground <br />breaking analysis of the P.E.P. Reef. Most of these investigations were required by the <br />Department of Environmental Regulation as part of the permitting process. The DEP has <br />required the County to be able to predict how the beach will change after the P. E. P. Reef <br />is installed (e.g., what is the expected performance of the P.E.P. Reef). <br />The most significant problem with predicting the performance of the P.E.P. Reef (with <br />absolute confidence) is that it is an experimental technology. To date, staff is aware of <br />only five other installations of a submerged breakwater in the United States and four of <br />these installations are less than two years old. At the time the County began the <br />permitting process, the only project with any history was the Dupont project in Palm Beach. <br />The other projects, including the Palm Beach Midtown project,_were less than a year old. <br />At the time of this writing, staff has now reviewed several monitoring reports from the <br />P.E.P. Reef midtown project, corresponded with out of state engineers regarding the three <br />New Jersey breakwaters and directed two model investigations of the proposed Vero <br />Beach project. Each of these reports, however limited, provide some insight into the <br />expected performance of the Vero Beach P.E.P. Reef. <br />Both the New Jersey Avalon submerged breakwater and the Palm Beach Midtown P. E. P. <br />Reef units settled 1 to 4 feet into the sand. The New Jersey project had the worst <br />settlement with an average of 4 feet while the Midtown project has experienced an average <br />of 3 feet for the first 54 units and 1.9 feet for the remaining 279 units. It is important to <br />distinguish the Midtown first 54 units because these were the only units aligned during <br />Hurricane Andrew. Under higher wave conditions there is a greater chance that sediments <br />will be eroded from around the units thereby allowing further -settlement. <br />P.E.P. settlement was not thought to be a significant problem in Vero Beach because a jet <br />probe survey found a layer of rock beneath the sand. The underlying rock must be <br />considered an asset because without it some type of foundation would be necessary. Staff <br />reanalyzed the survey data and computed the maximum depth of settlement for each of <br />the proposed P.E.P. Reef units (see Exhibit B). The P.E.P. Reef units will likely come to <br />rest on the rock at elevation -9.4 to -10.6 N. G. V. D. This means the P.E.P. Reef on <br />average will have between 3.4 and 4.6 feet of water over them at mid tide water levels. <br />Water depth over the reef is important because this is the most important criteria for <br />reducing wave heights. Both the University of Florida Vero Beach Physical Model Study <br />(U of F 1994) and the Midtown project have found the P.E.P. Reef reduces wave heights. <br />P.E.P. Reef wave height reduction can now be accurately determined for different water <br />depths, breakwater sizes and wave heights. <br />18 <br />MARCH 28, 1995 <br />s � <br />