My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/28/1995
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1995
>
3/28/1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:05:10 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 2:21:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/28/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Beth Mitchel o-Amd-$on Donaldson <br />March 24;"'l995 <br />Page 6 <br />Test Plan Matrix, Expectations and Limits, Vero Beach PEP Reef. <br />Wave Height Reduction - There is no discussion or documentation <br />of what is meant.by "Wave Height Reduction". Is this general <br />wave height reduction? Is this the reduction of the higher one <br />third of the waves measured at the site? Is this for individual <br />waves? The two nearshore gages will have to be located to <br />"track" a wave from the seaward side of the breakwater in a <br />specific depth, to the leeward side of the breakwater in a <br />specific depth., Control gages will also need to be established <br />to determine the effect of shoaling on wave height reduction. <br />The test to be applied to the transmission coefficients will be <br />that the measured average over -a one year period will be less <br />than the expectation: The same criteria shall be applied <br />separately to the higher it of the incident waves occurring over <br />a one year period. Quantification of this parameter will need to <br />be modified as outlined above. <br />Volumetric Changes - This criteria shall be applied immediately <br />landward of the proposed 4,000 feet of breakwater and will not <br />include the gap between the northern and southern components of <br />the entire structure. The lower limit of 5.0 cy/ft/year <br />translates to accumulation on an average annual basis of 20,000 <br />cubic yards landward of the proposed 4,000 feet (not including <br />the gap). The upper limit of -0.5 cy/ft/year translates to <br />erosion on an average annual basis not to exceed 2,000 cubic <br />yards landward of the proposed 4,000 feet (not including the <br />gap). <br />How will the material which is placed as part of the on-going <br />dune maintenance program be included in the volumetric change <br />assessment? Will the quantity placed be deleted on an annual <br />basis? <br />Shoreline Changes - The same comments as stated above for the <br />volumetric changes hold true for the shoreline changes. <br />Shoreline changes shall be analyzed in conjunction with the <br />volumetric data. Limits established for shoreline change, over <br />the monitoring period are: <br />a) if the Mean High Water (MHW) shoreline does not change <br />over the 3 year test period, without adverse effects to the <br />adjacent shordline. <br />b) The lower limit is the Mean High Water (MHW) shoreline <br />achieves an average of 5 feet of beach width increase per <br />year over the 3 year test period for a total of'15 feet. <br />c) The upper limit is that the Hean High Water (MHW) <br />shoreline recedes more than 0.5 feet per year with a total <br />recession of 1.5 feet -for the 3 year period, over any 400 <br />foot segment within the monitored area then the project <br />28 <br />MARCH 28, 1995 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.