06/04/2020 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Commissioners argues that it is the county commissioners who decides what "any time" is, subject to the one time in twelve months limitation. The Board of County Commissioners argues that there are three general paths a school board can take to place a measure on the ballot. It cites to School Board of Clay County, Florida v. Clay County, by and through its Board of County Commissioners, Case No. 10 -2019 -CA -806,2 for the proposition that "when the Legislature wants to grant to the district school boards the authority to directly place a resolution on the ballot, it says so. When the Legislature wants to grant to the district school boards the authority to select the type of election for its resolution, it says so." Id. The Board of County Commissioners argues that the third process by which a school district may place a matter before the voters is the method at issue in this case. The Board of County Commissioners states that this method is the same as the one at issue in the 2019 Clay County case, above. However, the Clay County case involves § 212.055 (6), which provides that in order to impose a school capital outlay surtax, the school board must draft a resolution that "shall be placed on the ballot by the governing body of the county." Unlike the statute at issue in this case, §212.055 does not state that the School Board must direct the county commissioners to call an election.3 Thus, the finding that § 212.055 allows the county commissioners to set the date of an election for a capital outlay surtax is inapplicable to this case. As counsel for the School Board noted at oral argument, Section 101133 is a statute that deals with the authority of the School Board, not that of the County Commissioners. There is nothing in §1011.73 requiring an election to be held in conjunction with any particular election or in conjunction with an election that would likely produce a larger turnout. The only restriction on the timing of the election is that there can only be one such election in a 12 -month period. The Court believes that this means that the School Board can only direct the county commissioners to call one such election in a 12 -month period. Mandamus is a "common law remedy used to enforce an established legal right by compelling a person in an official capacity to perform an indisputable ministerial duty required by law." Board of County Comm'rs Broward County, Florida v. Parrish, 154 So. 3d 412, 417 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014). An act is ministerial if there is no room for the exercise of the respondent's discretion and the performance being required is directed by law." Id The Court finds that under §1011.73(2), Florida Statutes, once the School Board "directs" the Board of County Commissioners to call an election for a certain date, the 2 See Exhibit E to the Complaint. 3 The Clay County case cites to Attorney General Opinion 98-29, involving s. 212.055(7), which also involves a surtax and which contains the language "shall be placed on the ballot by the governing body of the county." The opinion specifically contrasts the language in §212.055(7), which "merely provides that the governing body of the county is responsible for placing the resolution on the ballot" with statutes that "clearly authorize a school district to call a referendum or to direct the county commission to call such an election. Op. Att'y Gen. Fla 98-29(1998). The opinion refers to s. 236.31, Florida Statutes, a former version of s. 1011.73, Florida Statutes. See Ch. 02-387, Laws of Florida 3 11