Laserfiche WebLink
Board of County Commissioners <br />February 19, 2020 <br />Page Four <br />Board have it within their discretion the ability to appoint, at a minimum, a majority of the committee <br />members, therefore County staff recommends the Board adjust the current committee as detailed above. <br />Executive Director and Committee Staff <br />Currently, pursuant to section 103.22(6) of the Code, the County Administrator appoints the executive <br />office director to the children's services advisory committee. Per section 103.30 of the Code, the office of <br />the executive office director consists of a director and adequate staff to perform all duties assigned by the <br />children's services advisory committee. Under this Code provision, the executive office director provides <br />"all services needed to complete reports and activities required to meet the objectives of the children's <br />services advisory committee. These activities will include, but are not limited to, secretarial support for <br />the children's services advisory committee meetings and be the official record repository for said records, <br />keeping other records, monitoring agencies receiving funds, writing appropriate grants, producing written <br />materials, reviewing applications for funding, reporting to the children's services advisory committee, <br />preparing annual budgets, writing and presenting annual reports." <br />It is unclear in the proposed ordinance, how the Executive Director is chosen or the Executive Director's <br />duties. The proposal states that the Director grants approval for Board members to incur expenditures <br />chargeable to the County and reports the amount of revenue to be generated by the dedicated millage to <br />the committee. In further discussions with the representatives supporting the referendum, it appears that <br />the advocates wish to have the Executive Director have a more active role in children's services other than <br />monitoring grants. The Board needs to make a policy decision on whether the director position should be <br />expanded to include an advocacy role and coordination role between agencies. County staff is concerned <br />about an overlap with expertise in the children's health arena, a role more appropriate for the Indian River <br />County Hospital District, and school children's programs, a role more appropriate for the Indian River <br />County School Board. <br />If the funding level for children's services increases, more money will be needed for staffing even if the <br />director position is predominately a grant monitoring position. Staffing needs and responsibility levels <br />may vary depending on the millage established. Currently, the director spends 60% of her time on <br />children's services advisory committee matters, which increases to 80% during the grant review and <br />award process. If there is an increase in funding, more staff time will be dedicated to reviewing grant <br />applications and reimbursement requests. See attached spreadsheet, which is provided for illustrative <br />purposes only. In order to limit the inefficient use of taxpayer funds, more oversight and day to day <br />monitoring will be needed as the millage rate increases. County staff recommends that the administration <br />of the program be funded from the millage. <br />Use of Funds <br />In the current ordinance there is not a clear list of the types of programs and services that can be funded <br />with the children's services money. The proposed ordinance sets forth the following list of the different <br />uses of the funds. <br />(1) To allocate and provide funds for agencies in Indian River County which are operated for the <br />benefit of children, provided they are not under the exclusive jurisdiction of the public school <br />system. <br />ClUsersllegistarlAppDataiLocallTemplBCL TechnologieslearyPDF 81@BCL@OCODOB821@)BCL@OCODOB82 doc <br />4 <br />