My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2020-159A
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2020's
>
2020
>
2020-159A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2021 10:09:12 AM
Creation date
10/1/2020 10:55:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Contract
Approved Date
08/18/2020
Control Number
2020-159A
Agenda Item Number
8.AM.
Entity Name
Proshot Concrete, Inc.
Subject
CR 512 Bridge Repairs
FDOT 884078 & 884079
Project Number
IRC-1727
Bid Number
2020048
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
258
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
materials and equipment free and clear of all <br />Liens and evidence that the materials and <br />equipment are covered by appropriate property <br />insurance or other arrangements to protect <br />OWNER's interest therein, all of which must be <br />satisfactory to OWNER. <br />2. Beginning with the second <br />Application for Payment, each Application shall <br />include an affidavit of CONTRACTOR stating <br />that all previous progress payments received <br />on account of the Work have been applied on <br />account to discharge CONTRACTOR's <br />legitimate obligations associated with prior <br />Applications for Payment. <br />3. The amount of retainage with respect <br />to progress payments will be as stipulated in <br />the Agreement. <br />B. Review of Applications <br />1. ENGINEER will, within 10 days after <br />receipt of each Application for Payment, either <br />indicate in writing a recommendation of <br />payment and present the Application to <br />OWNER or return the Application to <br />CONTRACTOR indicating in writing <br />ENGINEER's reasons for refusing to <br />recommend payment. In the latter case, CON- <br />TRACTOR may make the necessary <br />corrections and resubmit the Application. <br />2. ENGINEER's recommendation of <br />any payment requested in an Application for <br />Payment will constitute a representation by <br />ENGINEER to OWNER, based on <br />ENGINEER's observations on the Site of the <br />executed Work as an experienced and quali- <br />fied design professional and on ENGINEER's <br />review of the Application for Payment and the <br />accompanying data and schedules, that to the <br />best of ENGINEER's knowledge, information <br />and belief: <br />a. the Work has progressed to the point <br />indicated; <br />b. the quality of the Work is generally in <br />accordance with the Contract Documents <br />(subject to an evaluation of the Work as a <br />functioning whole prior to or upon <br />Substantial Completion, to the results of <br />any subsequent tests called for in the <br />Contract Documents, to a final deter- <br />mination of quantities and classifications for <br />Unit Price Work under paragraph 9.08, and <br />to any other qualifications stated in the <br />recommendation); and <br />c. The conditions precedent to <br />CONTRACTOR's being entitled to such <br />payment appear to have been fulfilled in so <br />far as it is ENGINEER's responsibility to <br />observe the Work. <br />3. By recommending any such <br />payment ENGINEER will not thereby be <br />deemed to have represented that: (i) inspec- <br />tions made to check the quality or the quantity <br />of the Work as it has been performed have <br />been exhaustive, extended to every aspect of <br />the Work in progress, or involved detailed <br />inspections of the Work beyond the responsi- <br />bilities specifically assigned to ENGINEER in <br />the Contract Documents; or (ii) that there may <br />not be other matters or issues between the <br />parties that might entitle CONTRACTOR to be <br />paid additionally by OWNER or entitle OWNER <br />to withhold payment to CONTRACTOR. <br />4. Neither ENGINEER's review of <br />CONTRACTOR's Work for the purposes of <br />recommending payments nor ENGINEER's <br />recommendation of any payment, including <br />final payment, will impose responsibility on <br />ENGINEER to supervise, direct, or control the <br />Work or for the means, methods, techniques, <br />sequences, or procedures of construction, or <br />the safety precautions and programs incident <br />thereto, or for CONTRACTOR's failure to <br />comply with Laws and Regulations applicable <br />to CONTRACTOR's performance of the Work. <br />Additionally, said review or recommendation <br />will not impose responsibility on ENGINEER to <br />make any examination to ascertain how or for <br />what purposes CONTRACTOR has used the <br />moneys paid on account of the Contract Price, <br />or to determine that title to any of the Work, <br />materials, or equipment has passed to <br />OWNER free and clear of any Liens. <br />5. ENGINEER may refuse to recom- <br />mend the whole or any part of any payment if, <br />in ENGINEER's opinion, it would be incorrect <br />to make the representations to OWNER <br />referred to in paragraph 14.02.B.2. ENGI- <br />NEER may also refuse to recommend any <br />such payment or, because of subsequently <br />discovered evidence or the results of subse- <br />quent inspections or tests, revise or revoke any <br />such payment recommendation previously <br />made, to such extent as may be necessary in <br />00700 - General Conditions REV 5-10-13 <br />00700-39 <br />F1Public Works\ENGINEERING DIVISION PROJECTS\1727 CR -512 EB & WB Bridge (88407879) Repairs\t-Admin\Bid Documents\Master Contract Documents\00700 - General Conditions <br />REV 5-10-13.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.