My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02/15/2020
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2005
>
02/15/2020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/28/2020 9:54:31 AM
Creation date
10/28/2020 9:52:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/15/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
9.A.3. PUBLIC HEARING – ORDINANCE NO. 2005-005 – <br />MAVERICK GROUP LLC - REZONE 18.54 ACRES FROM A-1 <br />TH <br />TO RS-3 – NORTHEAST INTERSECTION OF 58 AVENUE <br />TH <br />AND 8 STREET - QUASI-JUDICIAL <br />PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR HEARING IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE <br />CLERK TO THE BOARD <br /> <br />Community Development Director Bob Keating reviewed the request for rezoning <br />by using a PowerPoint presentation (copy is on file). He specified that the Planning & Zoning <br />Commission and staff have recommended approval based on their findings of satisfying <br />concurrency tests, consistency with the Comprehensive Plan, no environmental impact, and <br />compatibility with the surrounding area. <br />Commissioner Wheeler emphasized his preference for connectivity and inquired <br />th <br />about the capacity at the intersection of 58 Avenue and SR-60. <br />Director Keating knew this intersection to be “broken” and explained that <br />concurrency tests are based on volumes and capacities and levels of services on roadway lengths <br />not intersections. Traffic Engineering and Community Development Departments evaluate <br />intersections (for development projects) and when they are broken, developers are required to fix <br />them or contribute to their fixing. He also explained considerations given to concurrency tests for <br />new applications concerning vested (impact fees paid) projects. <br />Commissioner Wheeler expressed his concerns about the increase of traffic at that <br />intersection and made suggestions for future consideration to facilitate moving cars away from an <br />accident scene. <br />Director Keating advised that staff is currently working on 9 LDR amendments one <br />of which should reduce traffic concerns. <br />Traffic Engineer Chris Mora explained that some of the approved projects that may <br />not be accounted for under the current procedures would be accounted for when the developers <br />look at their build-out year because not only do they account for their project’s traffic and all <br />vested trips, but they also have to grow the existing traffic on all of the lanes by some <br />pre-established growth percentage we tell them to use. <br />February 15, 2005 <br />18 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.