Laserfiche WebLink
although Emergency Services recommendations do not <br />specifically address private subdivisions (in addition to <br />planned developments), the proposed amendment does make <br />allowances for private subdivisions. <br />RECOMMENDATION: <br />Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners: <br />1. Direct staff to make any necessary changes to the proposed <br />ordinance; and <br />2. Announce its intentions to take final action on the proposed <br />ordinance at the Board's special hearing scheduled for 5:01 <br />p.m. on May 31, 1995, to be held in the County Commission <br />Chambers. <br />FINANCIAL <br />IMPACTS OF PROPOSED LDR AMENDMENTS <br />ON AFFORDABLE HOUSING. <br />Fall 1994/Winter 1995 LDR Amendment Proposals <br />Proposed LDR <br />Financial <br />Impact on Affordable Housing <br />1. Group home/ACLF separation Positive. Could allow for more <br />distance group housing in certain areas. <br />2. Temporary real estate sales Positive. Reduces certain <br />offices sales facility requirements <br />and may, therefore, slightly <br />reduce.costs for residential <br />developments. <br />3. Correct omission of Con -3/ None. <br />park listing <br />4. Agricultural uses in ROSE -4 None. <br />5. Sign -offs on minor site plans None. <br />6.. Driveway widths for mini - <br />storage uses <br />7. Update Chapter 912 SR 60 <br />setback <br />8. Open space for agricultural <br />properties <br />9. Open house signs <br />10. Chapter 930.08 changes <br />15 <br />MAY 159 1995 <br />None. <br />None. <br />None. <br />None. <br />Positive. Reduces a soil <br />certification requirement and <br />may, therefore, slightly reduce <br />costs for residential <br />developments. <br />BOOK95 FADE 15 <br />