My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/15/1995
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1995
>
5/15/1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:05:11 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 2:30:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/15/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The criteria which must be met to qualify for the exceptions -are as <br />described below. <br />1. All proposed road designations must follow the existing grid <br />pattern. <br />2. Proposed road names shall not duplicate, or closely <br />approximate, an existing road name within Indian River County. <br />3. Proposed road names for a Planned Development or proposed <br />roads located on the barrier island must be submitted to the <br />Community Development Department for approval concurrently <br />with submittal of the preliminary planned development plat or <br />subdivision plat. <br />4. Any existing or proposed road name change received aft6r the <br />recording of an approved plat,shall require a recording of a <br />corrective.plat at the requestor's expense. <br />Subsection 951.09(2)- Appeal of road name designation requirement <br />By proposing the permitted use of named roads within a Planned <br />Development as an exception to subsection 951.05 (4)(b), the <br />appeals process would only be applicable to subdivision plat plan <br />approval. <br />My staff and I will be happy to meet with you and it would be <br />appreciated if you would keep the Department of Emergency Services <br />informed of any proposed changes to the House Addressing Systems <br />Ordinance, Chapter 951. <br />Planning Director Stan Boling reviewed the proposed amendments <br />with the Board and advised that the Professional Services Advisory <br />Committee, the Planning and Zoning Commission and staff have all <br />reviewed and are in agreement on the proposed amendments, with the <br />exception of amendments to Item 23 , . Criteria for Allowing Road Name <br />Designations. Staff is recommending that the Board adopt the <br />proposed Ordinance. <br />Commissioner Eggert stated that she had a few questions on <br />several of the items, and Commissioner Bird requested that Director <br />Boling go over each item individually, giving the Board an <br />opportunity to pose questions. <br />1. Required Separation Distances Between Group <br />Homes/ACLFs <br />Director Boling advised that requirements are in place to <br />avoid concentration of these usages in residential areas; however, <br />the uses are also allowed in commercially zoned districts and staff <br />does not feel that the required separation distance is appropriate <br />in commercial areas or for larger projects that are along major <br />roadways since these tend not to be in residential neighborhood <br />areas. <br />17 Boa 95 PAGE 17 <br />MAY 159 1995 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.