My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/15/1995
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1995
>
5/15/1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:05:11 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 2:30:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/15/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BOOK 95 PnE 26 <br />impose more stringent requirements, but not counties. The County, <br />however, can remove signs in rights -of -ways and charge the <br />violator. <br />Director Keating advised that staff, with the assistance of <br />Code Enforcement, the Sheriff's Department and the municipal police <br />departments, confiscated quite a few signs during the last <br />election,' especially on election day near the voting precincts. <br />Commissioner Adams suggested possibly investigating the idea <br />of setting aside a few areas which would be designated political <br />sign areas, with restrictions for maybe the 30 days before the <br />election. <br />County Attorney Vitunac advised that could be done with public <br />property or rights-of-way but not with private property. <br />Commissioner Tippin emphasized that it is an imperfect world, <br />there are some people who do not always tell the truth, and laws <br />cannot be passed to change that. <br />23. Criteria for Allowing Road Name Designations <br />Director Keating reviewed the section and advised that this <br />last item has not been reviewed by the PSAC or the Planning & <br />Zoning Commission but incorporates the issue addressed regarding <br />the road name designation for Indian River Club. The exceptions to <br />requiring road numbers would be (1) continuation of existing named <br />roads; (2) roads on the barrier island; and (3) roads within a <br />planned development or a private subdivision that do not fit into <br />the County's existing grid system of east -west and north -south <br />roads. Staff determination would be final unless appealed and <br />appeal would go to the Planning & Zoning Commission and then to the <br />Board of County Commissioners. <br />The Chairman asked if anyone else wished to be heard in this <br />matter. There being none, he closed the public hearing. <br />There being no further business, on Motion duly made, seconded <br />and carried, the Board adjourned at 6:30 p.m. <br />ATTEST: <br />J. arton, Clerk <br />Minutes Approved: <br />26 <br />MAY 159 1995 <br />GLK <br />Kenneth R. Macht, Chai3fman <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.