My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/15/1995
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1995
>
5/15/1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:05:11 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 2:30:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/15/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The Board reviewed the following items: <br />TO: James Chandler <br />County Administrator <br />D I ION HEAD CONCU RENCE: <br />111 <br />ober W. Keati , Alf -fir <br />Community Develo ent• irector <br />FROM: Stan Boling AICP <br />Planning Director <br />DATE: May 9, 1995 <br />SUBJECT: First Hearing: Review of Staff -Initiated LDR Amendments <br />It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal <br />consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its special <br />meeting of May 15, 1995. <br />BACKGROUND: <br />Over the last several months, county staff has initiated <br />proposals to amend the county's land development regulations <br />(LDRs). During this time, the Professional Services Advisory <br />Committee (PSAC) and the Planning and Zoning Commission have <br />reviewed and made recommendations regarding these proposed <br />amendments, except for changes proposed for road name designation <br />criteria. Staff has consolidated all of these into ordinance form <br />(see attachment #1). <br />The Board will consider these amendments at two hearings (May 15th <br />and May 31st) . At the first hearing, it is the Board's duty to <br />consider each amendment within the proposed ordinance and to direct <br />staff to make any changes deemed necessary. At the second hearing, <br />the Board will need to take final action on the proposed ordinance. <br />ANALYSIS: <br />Staff has structured the proposed ordinance format such that each <br />ordinance section contains an amendment or amendments that are <br />related to a single topic. The analysis section of this report is <br />similarly structured, addressirLg each LDR issue section by section. <br />The following issues are addressed by the proposed amendments: <br />1. Required separation distances between group homes/ACLFs (971) <br />2. Approval-�procedures and requirements for temporary real estate <br />sales offices (972) <br />3. Correction of text omission: parks in Con -3 district (971) <br />4. Non-commercial agricultural uses in ROSE -4 district (911, 971) <br />5. Community Development sign -off for minor site plans (914) <br />6. Driving aisle widths for mini -storage projects (954) <br />7. Update of Chapter 912 SR 60 setback allowance (912) <br />8. Open space calculation for agricultural properties with <br />manmade waterbodies (901, 911) <br />9. Hours of display for open house signs (956) <br />10. Development project soils certification requirement (930) <br />11. Ordinance text references to public works staff (952, 954) <br />12. Minimum driveway widths for certain residential projects (952) <br />MAY 159 1995 <br />3 BOOK 95 FAU,Cr 03 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.