Laserfiche WebLink
BOOK 95 F,, a 08 <br />"stack -up" into a parking space back-up area or a <br />driveway/driving aisle intersection. <br />In strictly applying the current separation requirements to <br />various projects, public works staff and design professionals <br />have found the minor and intermediate driveway requirements to <br />be excessive. Public works staff are now proposing an LDR <br />amendment that decreases the separation distances applied to <br />minor and major driveways, and that reformats the LDR section <br />that contains those requirements. In the opinion of public <br />works staff, the proposed changes would adequately ensure <br />proper traffic circulation. <br />At its April 13; 1995 meeting, the Planning and Zoning <br />Commission discussed these proposed changes. Although no <br />public works staff were present to discuss the separation <br />distance recommendations, planning staff discussed the changes <br />and the reasons for staff's recommendation. As noted in the <br />draft ordinance, the Planning and Zoning Commission <br />recommended that the separation distance between rights-of-way <br />and on-site driveways and parking spaces, along intermediate <br />driveways, remain at 50' rather than the 25' standard <br />recommended by staff. Staff has not changed its <br />recommendation for a 25' separation distance. <br />Reference: PSAC meeting summary: 12/15/94 & 1/19/95 <br />(attachments 3 & 4). Planning and Zoning Commission meeting <br />minutes (attachment #7). <br />15. Staff -level Approval of Certain Administrative Permits. The <br />impetus for this proposed change was direction given by the <br />Planning and Zoning Commission at its December 8, 1994 <br />meeting. At that meeting, after approving a guest cottage <br />proposal, Planning and Zoning Commission members agreed that <br />staff should look into allowing staff approval for certain <br />routine administrative permit uses (such as guest cottages). <br />Based upon that directive, planning staff reviewed the current <br />LDR procedures for approving administrative permit uses. <br />Currently, LDR Chapters 971 and 902 require all administrative <br />permit uses, regardless of project size, to be reviewed and <br />approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission as well as by <br />staff. To change this requirement, staff proposes changes to <br />chapters 971 and 902 to accomplish the following: <br />a. Authorize staff -level approval for certain types of <br />administrative permit uses. <br />b. Provide that any uses that are approvable at the staff <br />level be specified as such under the special criteria <br />subsection for that use. <br />C. Provide that staff approvable administrative permit <br />requests accompanied by an administrative approval site <br />plan be approved by the community development director <br />and that requests accompanied by plans reviewed as minor <br />site plans be approved by the TRC. <br />d. Provide that staff apply all 971 specific criteria to <br />requests for such uses and authorize staff to apply <br />necessary safeguards and conditions to approvals of <br />requests (as the P&ZC does under the current LDR's). <br />8 <br />MAY 159 1995 <br />M M M <br />