09/15/2020 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ORDER NO. PSC -2020 -0293 -AS -EI DOCKET NOS. 20200067 -EI, 20200069 -EI, 20200070-EI,20200071-E1,20200092-EI PAGE 17 Attachment A a in, that benefits the customers of utilities subject to the Commission's regulatory jurisdiction. Accordingly, the Agreement is in the public interest and should be approved. 18. Pursuant to Rule 28-106.204(3), F.A.C., the Parties have conferred with the Florida Industrial Power Users Group. (' FIPU(3"), which was granted intervention by Order Nos. PSC - 2020 -0233 -PCO -EI. FIPUG has advised that it takes no position on the Agreement.' Notwithstanding, the Parties jointly submit that the proppsed Agreement is in the public interest and should be approved in its entirety for the reasons stated above.' WHEREFORE, for all the reasons stated above, the Office of Public Counsel, Gulf Power Company, Florida Power.& Light Company, and W almart Inc. jointly and respectfully request that the Florida Public Service Commission expeditiously -approve the Stipulation and Settlement Agreement provided as Attachment Ato this Joint Motion. z FIPUG did not actively participate in discovery or submit any testimony or evidence in opposition to the Gulf or FPL SPPs. In its Prehearing Statement, FIPUG did not take a specific position on any of the issues and, instead, adopted the positions of O1'C, which is a signatoty party to the Stipulation and Settleindiit Agreement provided as Attachment A to this ;Joint Motion. 'The Florida Supreme Court has affirmed that the Commission has the authority and discretion to approve a non -unanimous settlement over the objections of intervenors if the Commission finds the settlement is in the, public interest. Citizens, 146 So.3d at 1152-54; see also S. Fla. Hasp. & .Healthcare. Assn v. Jaber, 887 So.2d 1210, 1212-13 (Fla. 2004) (affirming the Commission's approval of a non -unanimous settlement agreement despite the absence of a full cvidcniiaryhearing), The Florida Supreme Court has explained that "it would be unreasonable to allow a single holdout party that does not get its way on one issue during settlement negotiations to derail the entire settlement process if settlement is fully in the public's interest all along." Sierra Club, 243 So.3d at 913.