My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/18/1995
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1995
>
5/18/1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:05:11 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 2:33:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/18/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
View images
View plain text
ability that the County has. At present with the single-family <br />home, the builders get the pay-off fee and the title company cuts <br />them a check. It would be better if it could be rolled to the end, <br />but it doesn't seem to work out that way. <br />With regard to prepayment capacity, Mr. Zorc knew there are <br />many people who have 25, 50, 100 or more prepaid water and sewer <br />credits for projects that probably will never happen and their only <br />option is to sell those credits back to Utilities. He suggested <br />that perhaps that could be corrected or fine-tuned a little bit. <br />He wondered why all these people have gone out and extended <br />themselves to commit to capacity if the prepayment of impact fees <br />is so flexible. <br />Mr. Zorc also suggested that SWDD fees be averaged out somehow <br />and collected at the building permit time. He felt that would <br />streamline the process a bit. <br />STRATEGIC PLAN <br />Review of Strategic Actions <br />Community Development Director Robert Keating reviewed the <br />following memo dated 9/3/93: <br />TO: The Members of the Affordable Housing Advisory Committee <br />THRU: Robert M. Keating, AICP AM K <br />Community Development Director <br />FROM: Christopher D. Rison <br />Senior Planner, Long -Ran Planning <br />DATE: September 3, 1993 <br />SUBJECT: Consideration of Impact Fees <br />It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal <br />consideration by the Affordable Housing Advisory Committee at its <br />regularly scheduled meeting of September 9, 1993. <br />DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS: <br />Residents of all communities create a need for public facilities to <br />support and protect their health, safety and general welfare. <br />These facilities vary from the more obvious needs of police and <br />fire protection, to the basic needs for roadways and utility <br />systems. In response to the needs of community residents, <br />governments act to provide these facilities to the greatest extent <br />possible. While government is responsible for providing such <br />facilities, an important issue is how those facilities will be paid <br />for. The funding of public facilities is further compounded by <br />growth. As a community grows and the number of residents <br />increases, the government must expand existing facilities to meet <br />the needs of both the existing residents and new residents. <br />11 1 <br />MAY 189 1995 <br />BOOK 95 PAGE 12® <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).