My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09/22/2020 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2020's
>
2020
>
09/22/2020 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/22/2021 12:31:45 PM
Creation date
1/22/2021 12:24:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
09/22/2020
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
467
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The Community Development Department has engineering on file showing <br />a 200' designed fall radius and a 550' actual fall radius. See attached staff <br />report, page 6 for the engineering on file. <br />4. Attached is a Power Point showing towers owned by Vertical Bridge that <br />have structures built after and near towers that are similar to the subject <br />tower. In their experience with counties across the country, regulations like <br />971.44 (g) are written to control the construction of new towers in order to <br />protect surrounding property owners from the risk, property devalue, etc a <br />new tower may impose. The tower on slide two is of most interest as it is in <br />Boca and very similar in height. <br />We are asking that the interpretation of section 971.44 (g) be reconsidered and <br />consistently applied. In other words, if all of the surrounding properties are <br />considered non -conforming and being treated as grandfathered, allow 6390 to be <br />grandfathered as well using the engineered fall radius or one that does not exceed <br />the closest property line. This would regulate all existing and future residential <br />structures be built at the same distance or greater away from the tower. Please <br />allow us to purchase and develop the property in accordance to its' zoning and the <br />LDR. As stated earlier, it seems that 971.44 (g) was originally written to regulate <br />the construction of new towers, not homes. <br />Attachments: <br />Proposed site plan <br />Non -conforming structure map <br />Staff report <br />Power Point <br />We sincerely appreciate your consideration. <br />Jacob & Elizabeth <br />ATTACH NT 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.