My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09/22/2020 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2020's
>
2020
>
09/22/2020 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/22/2021 12:31:45 PM
Creation date
1/22/2021 12:24:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
09/22/2020
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
467
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3. Are there any major permitting costs associated with constructing an additional driveway? <br />The access driveway proposed on the submitted conceptual plan [attachment 1] would not be <br />required to be paved on-site, but would need to be paved within the right-of-way (ROW) and will <br />require a ROW permit from the County's Engineering Division (772-226-1283). The application <br />is included in this letter for your review [see attachment 2]. The specific design and development <br />conditions for an access driveway will be discussed upon submission of the AOE plan. <br />4. May a home be built on any of the proposed parcels, outside the fall zone? <br />Be advised that staff has conducted research of the County's development database and site plan <br />files and was unable to locate a site plan for the tower. Therefore, we could not verify that a <br />designed fall zone was ever approved. You mentioned in your letter that you reviewed the <br />property's file and indicated on your drawing a fall zone of 200'. If you can provide documentation <br />on the fall zone, and how it was approved, we would be happy to review it. Otherwise, any <br />structure(s) would need to be setback a minimum distance from the tower that is equal to the tower <br />height, which is the default setback in section 971.44(1)(g)l of the County's LDR's [see <br />attachment 3]. The County's Telecommunications Inventory indicates a height of 503.8' for this <br />tower [see attachment 41. <br />As noted previously, any new property line cannot create a setback non -conformity for the existing <br />tower. Using the setback of 503.8' for any new proposed property will affect proposed lot layouts. <br />5. May a pond be allowed in the area shown on the submitted plan, and are there any depth or size <br />restrictions? <br />A pond may be dug, following the provisions of section 934.04(9). [See attachment 51 <br />6. Are there any impact fees that they be credited from previous development? <br />The County's permitting database indicates a demolition permit was issued in 2005 to demolish <br />an existing house. However, the size of the house was not included on the permit description. <br />Single family residential impact fees are based on the size of the home and have three (3) <br />categories (less than 1,500 sf; 1,500 to 2,499 sf; and 2,500 sf or larger). While an impact fee is <br />creditable for the subject property, the exact amount cannot be determined at this time. If you have <br />documentation of the size of the previous house, that should be included with submission of a <br />single-family home building permit application. In the absence of such documentation, the County <br />would credit the lowest size. <br />If you have any questions, you may contact me at (772) 226-1715 or pmurphy@lrc og v.com. <br />Sincerely, <br />Patrick J. Murp , Senior PiandIr <br />Community Development Department <br />ATTACHMENT 6 <br />200 <br />FACommunity DevelopmenWurDev\TMs and correspondence\2018 TMs\TM2018-0128 6390 'nth Street (Tower Pmel).docx 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.