My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/08/2020
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2020's
>
2020
>
12/08/2020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2021 1:26:14 PM
Creation date
1/29/2021 1:21:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
12/08/2020
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
223
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
All of which sends a clear message. The County intends to make it difficult for residents to have any <br />meaningful input into land use decisions. Given this obvious disdain for citizen participation, I will be <br />brief. <br />I am astounded at the cavalier approach to the major change in the land use designation represented <br />by this proposed development. In the County's General Plan, medical related uses were designated for <br />the undeveloped portions of the large tract of land bounded by Indian River Boulevard to the east, <br />U.S. Highway 1 to the west, 37th Street to the south and 41st Street to the north. Given the location of <br />the regional hospital on 37th Street, this designation makes a lot of sense and was obviously intended <br />to meet local needs over a long period of time, certainly several decades, and perhaps longer. <br />Accordingly, one would expect significant reasons to be presented to justify changing the land use <br />designation to residential for what appears to be the largest single parcel within this tract of land. Yet <br />no such significant reasons are referenced in your staff report. Rather, it is stated that recent medical <br />related uses have occurred on the south side of 37th Street, and that this land has remained <br />undeveloped. This represents nothing more than market forces at work. It is obvious that vacant land <br />closer to the hospital will be developed before this land. This was known and obvious when the <br />General Plan was adopted. As more people move to the area, and as the population continues to age, it <br />is equally obvious that the need for medical related uses will not diminish with the passage of time, <br />but will increase. It is not just that no significant reasons have been presented for this zoning change, <br />it is that. no reasons whatsoever have been presented. <br />Only the land owner will benefit from this rezoning. One does not have to be a real estate expert to <br />realize that land in this area zoned for housing will sell faster, and for a higher price, than land zoned <br />for anything else. Absent this rezoning, the Virginia W. Russell Family Limited Partnership and <br />Segment Markets 85, Inc. would have to wait for the free market to function as intended. Eventually, <br />their land would be sold for medical related uses, and they would receive less money. This is exactly <br />how the free market is supposed to work. Instead, the landowner seeks government intervention in <br />the form of a rezoning to give them an immediate financial windfall. My questions are simple. Why is <br />the County complicit in this process? Why does the County propose a rezoning that will provide no <br />benefit the County's residents, and most likely result in a future detriment? Why does the County seek <br />to provide a significant financial benefit (most likely several million dollars) to a private land owner? <br />While your staff report is virtually incomprehensible in places, it is clear in its intent to use a great <br />deal of boilerplate and planning jargon to create the impression that this rezoning offers public <br />benefits. Close examination, however, reveals no public benefits that are not standard requirements <br />for any new development of any kind whatsoever. Having the developer contribute the land (at no <br />cost) for a public right-of-way for any public streets is standard operating procedure. So, too, is <br />requiring that the developer pay for sidewalks, street lighting, a storm drainage system and a <br />landscaping buffer. Accordingly, all such infrastructure costs would be paid by the developer of <br />medical related uses in the future and represent nothing more than standard benefits that result from <br />standard requirements. <br />The comment that the rezoning will provide housing for the nearby medical workers is laughable. One <br />of the primary benefits of the area is the proximity of all levels of housing within a short drive of the <br />hospital. This is not an urban area where local workers must commute for an hour or more to find <br />suitable housing. <br />In summary, this rezoning makes no sense whatsoever. It offers no benefitsto the local community. It <br />contravenes the General Plan. It removes land for medical -related uses that will most assuredly be <br />2 <br />62,,43- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.