My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/31/1995
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1995
>
5/31/1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:05:11 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 2:36:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/31/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
complicated and technical. He stated that he gets a great many <br />calls about noise in relation to mining and would appreciate an <br />opportunity to become better educated in this area. <br />Vice Chairman Adams realized the possibility that by relieving <br />one problem, 2 or 3 others can be caused. However, she felt that <br />the Board is trying to react to a very real problem. She felt that <br />the best solution at this time would be to try the 300 foot setback <br />as it can be revised at the next LDR review and, in the meantime, <br />take the opportunity to workshop the subject. <br />Public Works Director Jim Davis stated that there is a narrow <br />zone between the groundwater table at 15 feet and the floodplain <br />elevation at 22 feet. That 7 foot zone is the only important area <br />where you get floodplain displacement because below elevation 15, <br />once you dig a hole and fill it full of water, it stays full and <br />you do not get any floodplain storage there. Once you get above <br />the 100 year floodplain, above elevation 22, you are already at a <br />100 year floodplain, and you can fill as high as you want. <br />Vice Chairman Adams reiterated that we have a motion on the <br />floor to replace the 500 foot setback with the 300 foot setback <br />from all roads, stockpiles, and mining pits; with the additional <br />restriction that at no point in time will the mining pit be less <br />than 150 feet from the property line. <br />THE VICE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and the <br />motion carried by a 4-0 vote (Chairman Macht <br />being absent). <br />22. Political Sign Regulations <br />Director Boling then advised that the beginning of the <br />political sign amendment has been revised to indicate that a <br />political sign displayed in the County does require a sign permit. <br />Staff had investigated having political signs grouped in certain <br />areas; however, State Statutes prohibit using State rights-of-way <br />for placement of political signs. This would cause problems at <br />major intersections such as Kings Highway and SR -60 as you would be <br />dealing with the County rights-of-way. With or without <br />improvements or widening, Public Works has stated that the average <br />distance between the edge of the pavement and the edge of the <br />right-of-way is 10 to 20 feet. Staff has concerns that <br />intersections are the places where you have the most problems with <br />potential visual obstruction, as well as the possibility of <br />it <br />IIAY 319 1995 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.