My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/31/1995
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1995
>
5/31/1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:05:11 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 2:36:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BOOK S 5 FIf2,23 <br />Planning Director Stan Boling reviewed the changes to the <br />proposed amendments directed by the Board at the May 15, 1995 <br />hearing. Of the 5 different changes that were made, 3 of them are <br />quite minor: <br />No. 8: Open Space Calculation for Agricultural <br />Properties with Manmade Water Bodies. <br />The text footnote which appeared at the top of page 5 has <br />been included in Footnote No. 1. <br />No. 15: Staff Level Approval of Certain Administrative <br />Permits. <br />Text of Paragraph (g) has been amended to reflect the <br />correct appeal procedures. <br />No. 16: Accessory Storage Structures Restrictions and <br />Prohibitions. <br />Language has been added in Paragraph B prohibiting travel <br />trailers and vehicle bodies being used for accessory <br />storage units. <br />The two items that are more substantive deal with No. 21, <br />Restrictions on Certain Mining Activities and No. 22, Political <br />Sign Regulations, as follows: <br />21.' Restrictions on Certain Mining Activities <br />Director Boling continued that what was originally proposed <br />was a change to the mining ordinance where there were concerns <br />about more than just the distance of the mining pit itself to <br />adjacent properties. Stockpiles and on-site roadways were also <br />issues that came up. As the mining ordinance now stands, there is <br />a 150 foot setback from the pit area to site boundaries. That <br />setback would not change in any of the proposals that the Board has <br />considered. At the meeting on May 15, the Board directed staff to <br />remove the words "either of" from Paragraph (3)(b); to remove <br />reference to a "letter of no objection" from Paragraph (3) (b) 1; and <br />to remove Paragraph (3)(b)2 in its entirety. Those changes have <br />been made. <br />Director Boling then continued the discussion regarding the <br />proposed 500 foot setbacks for the mining pit, on-site haul routes <br />and stockpile areas to adjacent occupied structures. These changes <br />are significant in that some sites would have to be quite large to <br />accommodate these setbacks. For a 30 acre pit, the approximate <br />dimensions of the site would need to be 1,000 feet by 1,300 feet. <br />If there were houses adjacent to the site, in order to have a 30 <br />acre pit, the site would need to be approximately 110 to 115 acres. <br />Staff has reviewed the situation and believes that the 150 foot <br />MAY 319 1995 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.