6/13/1995 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

boo K 95 PAGE 381 (according to the County's LDR's) is the maximum number of units that could be built on the site, given the size of the property and the maximum density under the proposed land use designation. The site information used for the concurrency analysis is as follows: 1. Size of Area to be Redesignated: 2. Existing Land Use Designation: ±298 acres ±233 acres of C-2, Conservation -2 (up to 1 unit/40 acres on site; TDR up to 1 unit/acre) and ±65 acres of M-2. Medium -Density Residential -2 (up to 10 units/acre) 3. Maximum Number of Units with Existing Land Use Designation: 883 4. Proposed Land Use Designation: C-1, Conservation -1 (zero density) 5. Maximum Number of Units with Proposed Land Use Designation: 0 As per section 910.07(2) of the Concurrency Management Chapter of the County's LDRs, projects which do not increase density or intensity of use are exempt from concurrency requirements. This land use amendment request is exempt from concurrency review, because the requested land use designation would not increase the total number of potential units that the site could accommodate. It is important to note that there will be no effect on service levels for any public facility as a result of the proposed land use amendment. Compatibility with the Surrounding Area Under the requested C-1 designation,, -there will be no development on the subject property except for minor facilities associated with passive recreation activities. For that reason, the subject request will enhance compatibility between development on the site and surrounding land uses. If the site were to take advantage of the Planned Development (PD) and TDR provisions of the LDRs, the most intense use of the subject property under the existing land use designation would be 883 units. Without the PD and TDR provisions, the -most intense use of the site under the existing land use designation would be 655 units. Furthermore, under the existing land use designation nearly all development would have to take place in the ±65 acre upland portion of the subject property. That portion of the site abuts the Forest Park single-family subdivision and the South Vero Square Shopping Center. In contrast, development under the requested land use designation would be limited to conservation uses and recreational uses. In terms of traffic, noise, and aesthetics, the impacts of these uses will be significantly less than development under the existing zoning district. •In fact, the recreational uses allowed under the requested zoning district would serve as an amenity for nearby residential uses. For these reasons, staff has determined that this requested zoning district will be compatible with the surrounding area. JUNE 139 1995 41 r