Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />95 .YALE 33 . <br />- Future Land Use Element Objective 8 <br />Future Land Use Element Objective 8 states that the county will <br />preserve and protect archaeologically significant sites. The <br />subject property contains three archaeologically significant sites. <br />Since the proposed amendment works to ensure the preservation of <br />the subject property, the request implements Future Land Use <br />Element Objective 8. <br />- Future Land Use Element Objective 15 <br />Future Land Use Element Objective 15 states that the county shall <br />encourage land uses which complement and enhance the Indian River <br />Lagoon. By prohibiting development on the subject property, except <br />for that which is associated with passive recreational uses, the <br />proposed amendment will implement Future Land Use Element Objective <br />15. <br />- Conservation Element Policy 6.3 <br />Conservation Element Policy 6.3 involves the need to acquire and <br />properly maintain Coastal/Tropical Hammock. While public <br />acquisition of the Coastal/Tropical Hammock on the site has been <br />accomplished, the proposed amendment will work to ensure the <br />continued preservation of the hammock. For that reason, the <br />proposed amendment is consistent with Conservation Element Policy <br />6.3. <br />As part of the staff analysis, all policies in the comprehensive <br />plan were considered. Based upon this analysis, staff determined <br />that the proposed land use designation amendment is consistent with <br />the comprehensive plan. <br />Potential Impact on Environmental Quality <br />The site's existing land use designations. offer limited <br />environmental protections, particularly for the M-2 designated <br />uplands. Residential development on the ±65 acre upland portion of <br />the subject property would be required to preserve only 15 percent <br />of the site, or 9.75 acres. In contrast, under the proposed <br />amendment the entire site would be preserved, and development would <br />be limited to conservation and compatible passive recreational <br />uses. <br />Although the site is publicly owned and could be developed as a <br />public park und6r the existing land use designations and zoning <br />districts, the proposed amendment provides the site with additional <br />protection from development.. By prohibiting most types of <br />development on the site, the proposed request will ensure that the <br />environmental quality of the site will be preserved. <br />For these reasons, the proposed amendment is anticipated to <br />positively impact the environmental quality of the subject <br />property. <br />CONCLUSION <br />Based on the analysis, staff has determined that the proposed <br />amendment is consistent with the comprehensive plan, compatible <br />with all surrounding land uses, will cause no adverse impacts on <br />the provision of public services, and will positively impact the <br />environment. For these reasons, staff supports the request. <br />JUNE 13, 1995 43 <br />