My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/25/2021 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2020's
>
2021
>
01/25/2021 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/11/2021 10:51:18 AM
Creation date
6/11/2021 10:48:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
01/25/2021
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Summary and Comparison of Options <br />Based upon the new information staff has prepared an analysis of the two vaccine registration solution <br />options as shown in the table below: <br />14 e <br />.. <br />Functionality being developed. <br />Funct�anauty upon " " <br />^��� �,� �� . <br />Likely implementation in coming <br />Luminare <br />Waitlist <br />� �'� � � � <br />implementation <br />weeks <br />a z� ,` <br />°Mid late weed of�lapuary 25t" <br />3 ?days from contract`"Similar <br />(Luminare for <br />Time to implement <br />�, �Imt�al <br />�mplementat�on would" <br />waitlist) <br />M <br />System operating in Texas' <br />VgM <br />ti <br />" <br />VState manage jmplementation� <br />but not implemented in <br />AK <br />Lower risk to County if <br />Share Care <br />Risk of Implementation <br />Florida yet. This would be the�� <br />t <br />amplernentation challenges � �Y� <br />first Florida implementation, <br />��System is fully integrated with ��e <br />Working to integrate with <br />aFlor�da ShotsW�Also; helpful to f <br />Integration with State <br />Florida Shots, but not <br />be partiofistatewide solution°fore <br />Share Care <br />completed <br />coord�riation�acrosscounties,. <br />reporting to Fetl t"`y ' "> <br />go, <br />' <br />iR <br />Will receive functionality as <br />destiny"Canequest" <br />determined by the State. Could <br />Self-determination <br />customrzat�ons for functions, " <br />Luminare <br />have allies in other counties to <br />like"res�dncyiequirement <br />request additional functionality <br />This may:carry additionalcost � <br />$10,000 implementation cost.���" <br />Total $150,000, plus ancillary <br />x <br />Funded byStat No cost to n <br />Cost <br />costs such as text message, <br />Share Care <br />robo-call costs ($0.015 per <br />text after first 10,000) <br />X^6k?a*, <br />�*%Would allowMi;Or continued State w. <br />limited <br />r�supiaort fior resources"at "� <br />Share Care <br />State support <br />State operated I", nterWth <br />County provided with ourEM <br />a local number for residents at <br />Share Care <br />Call Center <br />resources at County expense <br />° <br />"" " <br />� <br />no cost`to Cour►ty� �,� � ��� <br />Similar fuctionahty w�t�t <br />` Stri�ilar o�Lumrnare,except <br />Similar (Luminare <br />Sh"are Care withaddttion of <br />�waitlist funct�anal�ty wdl occur <br />advantage due to <br />Functionality <br />"�" <br />w+rarthst uponiiplementation <br />. tater _ <br />waitlist timing) <br />Note: Option with advantage by category shaded in blue <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.