Laserfiche WebLink
impacts to the Spoonbill permit with current disposal capacity limited to 2.0 MGD up to <br /> 3.0 MGD, including a potential change in water quality that will occur if the <br /> determination to use the LFA for raw water is feasible . <br /> Consultant will evaluate the potential of increasing the South WTP capacity and impacts <br /> to the 1.5 MGD permit concentrate discharge to the ATS and freshwater disposal, <br /> including a potential change in water quality if the determination to use the LFA for raw <br /> water is feasible and what impacts this has to the regulatory permit.. <br /> Consultant will review the existing demineralized concentrate(DC)permits for Oslo and <br /> Hobart to determine the potential and necessity for deep injection well disposal. <br /> Consultant will review IRC service area to determine optimal location for deep injection <br /> well. It is desired to locate DIW in feasible location for WWTP treated effluent,DC, and <br /> potentially leachate disposal. Consultant will evaluate the dual use of the well,costs to <br /> construct a new DIW and dual zone monitor well(DZMW)that will be required as part <br /> of the DIW. Conceptual costs for a new pipeline will be provided. Pipeline routing study <br /> is not included with this evaluation. <br /> Task 4—Indirect Potable Reuse <br /> Consultant will evaluate conceptually aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) and indirect <br /> potable reuse(IDPR) at the regional wastewater treatment plant to provide additional <br /> source water for potable treatment. The desktop study will evaluate the anticipated <br /> treatment and associated cost required to recharge the Upper Floridan Aquifer with <br /> reclaimed water from the wastewater treatment plant and include potential options for <br /> advanced treatment and associated costs to utilize this water resource for potable water <br /> treatment either at the Oslo Plant or at a new water treatment plant. <br /> Evaluation will consist of ASR feasibility; expected aquifer characteristics for the ASR <br /> application;the likely permitting requirements and timeframes to permit, number of ASR <br /> wells required,expected flows and associated costs for construction and operations;deep <br /> injection well requirements for concentrate disposal potential other applications; water <br /> treatment options;water transmission requirements; and estimated costs. <br /> Consultant will also review current and prospective future regulations, establishing water <br /> quality goals/parameters for the reclaimed water and advanced treated water, <br /> identification of advanced water treatment alternatives,and analysis of site conditions to <br /> ascertain the feasibility of integrating advanced treatment of-reclaimed water at the either <br /> the West WWTP(6 MGD rating)or the Central WWTP(4 MGD rating). This evaluation <br /> will be used to develop conceptual alternatives for the implementation of advanced <br /> treatment at either facility. <br /> Consultant will review existing and historical direct and indirect potable reuse projects <br /> throughout the United States.The treatment technologies currently used, and respective <br /> F:\Utilities\UTILrfY-Engineering\WATER\CUP-10524\Admin\KHA\2021.5.1-FINAL AWS Eval Scope th <br /> MDM_vb.docr <br /> Page5of11 <br />