My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05/04/2021
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2020's
>
2021
>
05/04/2021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/24/2021 10:38:26 AM
Creation date
6/24/2021 10:07:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
05/04/2021
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
230
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY <br />OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET <br />PURCHASING DIVISION <br />DATE: April 26, 2021 <br />TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS <br />THROUGH: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator <br />Kristin Daniels, Director, Office of Management and Budget <br />FROM: Jennifer Hyde, Purchasing Manager <br />SUBJECT: Final Ranking of Firms and Award of RFP 2021039 for Cyber Security Policy <br />Development <br />BACKGROUND: <br />On behalf of the Department of Utility Services and Information Technology Department a <br />Request for Proposals ("RFP") was issued for the development of cybersecurity policies for County <br />owned information systems, including SCADA and ICS systems, in accordance with the National <br />Institute of Standards and Technologies (NIST) Cybersecurity Framework and Guide to Industrial <br />Control Systems (ICS) Security. RFPs were advertised on March 18, 2021 and responses received <br />April 7, 2021. <br />ANALYSIS: <br />A selection committee comprised of Vincent Burke, Director, Department of Utility Services, Dan <br />Russell, Director, Information Technology and Randy King, Information Systems & <br />Telecommunications Manager independently evaluated and scored the received proposals in <br />accordance with the RFP document and Purchasing Manual. Evaluation criteria included <br />responsiveness, firm overview, qualifications and project approach and price. These scores were <br />compiled by the committee and an overall initial ranking of firms developed. The committee <br />determined interviews were not necessary for either RFP and the initial rankings of firms declared <br />final. <br />62 <br />Proposing Firm <br />Location <br />Proposed Price <br />1. <br />Sentinel Technologies, Inc. <br />Downers Grove, IL <br />$29,455 <br />2. <br />Enterprise Risk Management, Inc. dba ERMProtect <br />Coral Gables <br />$34,603 <br />3. <br />True North Consulting Group, LLC <br />Stillwater, MN <br />$33,120 <br />4. <br />Securance LLC <br />Tampa <br />$35,960 <br />5. <br />RSM US LLP <br />Melbourne <br />$71,506 <br />6. <br />Global Solutions Group, Inc. <br />Oak Park, MI <br />$21,390 <br />7. <br />RB Advisory, LLC <br />Winter Park <br />$46,250 <br />8. <br />Kimble and Associates LLC dba Kuma <br />Bristow, VA <br />$98,000 <br />62 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.