My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2021-047
CBCC
>
Resolutions
>
2020's
>
2021
>
2021-047
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/20/2021 2:43:15 PM
Creation date
7/20/2021 2:07:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolutions
Resolution Number
2021-047
Approved Date
07/13/2021
Agenda Item Number
14.A.1.
Resolution Type
Santuary Designation
Entity Name
Indian River County
Subject
Declaring Indian River County a Second Amendment Sanctuary Designation
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RESOLUTION 2021 - 047 <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF <br />INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, DECLARING INDIAN RIVER <br />COUNTY A SECOND AMENDMENT SANCTUARY. <br />WHEREAS, the Constitution of the United States is the supreme law of our nation; and <br />WHEREAS, the Second Amendment to the Constitution states, "a well -regulated militia <br />being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not <br />be infringed"; and <br />WHEREAS, the U.S. Supreme Court in the District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 <br />(2008), affirmed that the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms is not connected in any <br />way to service in a militia; and <br />WHEREAS, the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution states that "no State shall make <br />or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; <br />nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor <br />deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws"; and <br />WHEREAS, the U.S. Supreme Court, in McDonald v. City of Chicago, 561 U.S. 742 <br />(2010), affirmed that a person's Second Amendment right to "keep and bear arms" is further secured <br />by the "due process" and the "privileges and immunities" clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment. <br />This decision also protects rights closely related to the Second Amendment, namely the right to <br />manufacture, transfer, purchase, and sell firearms, accessories, and ammunition; and <br />WHEREAS, the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution states that "the powers not delegated <br />to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States <br />respectively, or to the People"; and <br />WHEREAS, the U.S. Supreme Court found in Printz v. United States, 521 U.S. 898 (1997), <br />that the Federal government cannot compel law enforcement officers of the States to enforce federal <br />laws as it would increase the power of the Federal government far beyond that which the <br />Constitution intended; and <br />WHEREAS, Article I, Section 8, of the Florida Constitution states that "the right of the <br />people to keep and bear arms in defense of themselves and of the lawful authority of the state shall <br />not be infringed, except that the manner of bearing arms may be regulated by law"; and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.