My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/20/2021 (4)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2020's
>
2021
>
04/20/2021 (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2021 2:02:36 PM
Creation date
8/16/2021 11:36:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
04/20/2121
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
576
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5 -year CIP; they are not fully funded and only right-of-way acquisition is planned to occur within <br />the next 5 years. <br />Historic Approvals on the Subiect Site <br />On March 4th 2003 the BCC approved a rezoning request initiated by Simon Property Group, LP <br />to change the subject site from 4.5 acres of A-1, Agricultural -I District; 16.6 acres of RM -6, <br />Multiple -Family Residential (up to 6 units/acre); and 19.2 acres of RS -6, Single -Family <br />Residential (up to 6 units/acre) to RM -8, Multiple -Family Residential (up to 8 units/acre) (see <br />Attachment 4). Subsequently on January 20th 2009, the BCC reviewed and approved a request <br />from Sunnyside Up 1, LLC to rezone the subject site from RM -8, Multiple -Family Residential (up <br />to 8 units/acre) to PDTND, Planned Development Traditional Neighborhood Design. That <br />approval allowed for up to 354 residential units (a mix of single and multiple family) and <br />approximately 32,000 square feet of commercial/retail space with a reverter clause stating that if <br />no project construction had commenced within 10 years from approval of the ordinance, the PD <br />zoning would terminate and revert back to the prior RM -8 zoning. In 2009, the BCC modified this <br />planned development's reverter deadline to increase it by 2 years (see Attachment 5). Subsequently <br />on December 13th 2011, the BCC extended the reverter deadline 7 additional years to January 20th <br />2029 (see Attachment 6). <br />The current rezoning request, if approved, would revert the subject site back to the RM -8 zoning <br />district that was previously approved by the BCC in 2003. <br />Zoning District Differences <br />In terms of potential uses, there are a few substantial differences between the existing PDTND <br />district and the proposed RM -8 district. The most notable difference between the existing PDTND <br />district and proposed RM -8 district, is that the proposed RM -8 zoning district allows for a <br />maximum of approximately 322 residential units while the existing PDTND district allows for a <br />total of 354 residential units and 32,000 sq. ft. of commercial floor area. The purpose statement <br />for these zoning districts, found in the County's Land Development Regulations (LDRs), are as <br />follows: <br />Planned Development Traditional Neighborhood Design: The Planned Development Traditional <br />Neighborhood Design zoning district is established for the following purposes; <br />• To implement the policies of the comprehensive plan. <br />• To provide for planned residential communities, containing a variety of .building <br />arrangements, planned commercial and tourist commercial centers, planned industrial <br />parks, planned public and quasi -public facilities, or planned multiple use centers which <br />include a diversity of residential, commercial, industrial and public uses that are <br />complementary and compatible with adjacent areas and developed in accordance with an <br />approved development plan. <br />• To allow diversification of uses, structures, and open spaces in a manner compatible with <br />existing and pennitted land uses on abutting properties. <br />• To reduce energy costs through a more efficient use of land design and smaller networks <br />of utilities and streets. than is possible through application of other: zoning districts and <br />subdivision requirements. <br />• To ensure that development will occur according to the limitations of use, design, density, <br />121 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.